Pinhole Attempt #2

A couple days ago I uploaded my first developed 4x5 pinhole negative. I thought the film was baked, or fogged. Some comments were made that suggested the film was okay but it was underexposed (due to reciprocity). This shot however was exposed in sunset with sun behind. It required a mere 1.5 seconds exposure in comparison to the other. But same effect here. In fact it looks fogged. Fogging could be due to bad film that got baked by being stored in a hot garage for at least one summer, could it not? I welcome any and all comments and critiques.
Location
San Luis Obispo
Equipment Used
Handmade 4x5 pinhole camera
Exposure
1.5 seconds
Film & Developer
Bergger BPF 200, Rodinal 1/50
Paper & Developer
Scan
Lens Filter
None

spot meter the trees. the rest will fall into place.

1SharpMonkey said:
Yes I saw your beautiful photographs. It is hard to believe you gave the exposure times you said you did for the one with the bridge in it.

yup. trust the force luke!

have fun!
 

Media information

Category
Critique Gallery
Added by
Perry Way
Date added
View count
692
Comment count
11
Rating
0.00 star(s) 0 ratings

Image metadata

Filename
image2.jpg
File size
35.2 KB
Dimensions
850px x 676px

Share this media

Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…