paper negative shots

• 

  papagene

• Aug 24, 2004

Interesting... keep experimenting and posting your results.
gene

 

• PhotoTyler

• Aug 24, 2004

Thanks, i was basically trying to get everything technically acurate in these attempts, i'll go for actual subject matter on my next attempts.

 

• removed account4

• Aug 24, 2004

wow, i never would have thought of putting paper in a 35mm camera
very cool

 

• 

  Mateo

• Aug 24, 2004

what about paper flatness?

 

• rogueish

• Aug 25, 2004

This looks purple and white on my monitor. Is this typical of paper negs or is it my monitor?
Not too bad of composure for " basically trying to get everything technically acurate ". And PAPER in a 35mm!?! cool
Looking forward to seeing more...

 

• 

  sparx

• Aug 25, 2004

This could be the fad that gets ilford back on its feet. Rolls of 24 exp. Multi grade in your choice of gloss or lustre.

 

• 

  Stan. L-B

• Aug 25, 2004

A very good result, a typical example of a well executed paper negative.
However, from the above remarks I feel the method employed with the size of the paper negative and the purpose is called for.
I feel that it would enhance the posting.

 

• PhotoTyler

• Sep 10, 2004

this was a 35mm paper negative from a canon rebel 2000, and i metered for iso 6 and it was around 24 seconds at F8.

Thanks for your comments.

 

• 

  gma

• Sep 11, 2004

Thanks for sharing your test results. I have been thinking of making 4x5 fiber base paper negatives using an old uncoated antistigmat lens wide open to try to achieve "semi-Kallitype pictorialist" landscape images.

 

• hbc

• Sep 11, 2004

good shot! I get more feeling from this picture than from some of the stuff shot with and 8x10 developed in pmk and printed on azo. wich goes to prove that it is not the camera but the eye that takes the picture keep it up.