Gents, Thank You. I had the shot in dig, and have wanted it on MF for the last couple yrs. 'Different as a square. 'Took it in Portra also, but didn't like the result.
I did add contrast - no doubt, but the raw scan is rather crisp also. The biggest difference I see is in the contrast of the fg reflection. Raw scan is done as a color neg (from FP4), so you'll see a dominant orange cast.
'Just saw the question, Fred. My last 4 rolls of FP4 were shot at ISO50 and I like the result better, though I'd have to give the preference to PanF at ei25. Thomas Bertilsson's thread me the time/temp/dilution, though he exposed at ei 80 http://www.apug.org/forum/index.php?threads/pyrocat-hd-dev-times.144728/ post#16