Img819

• 

  Andrew O'Neill

• Jun 25, 2017

Wow!

 

• removed account4

• Jun 25, 2017

you can say that again !

 

• Gerry M

• Jun 25, 2017

Superb shot!

 

• HiHoSilver

• Jun 25, 2017

Gents, Thank You. I had the shot in dig, and have wanted it on MF for the last couple yrs. 'Different as a square. 'Took it in Portra also, but didn't like the result.

 

• 

  Andrew O'Neill

• Jun 25, 2017

Havr to say it again. Wow!

 

• 

  Eric Rose

• Jun 25, 2017

Love the shot but on my calibrated monitor the contrast looks like it got away on you either in scanning or PS.

 

• HiHoSilver

• Jun 25, 2017

I did add contrast - no doubt, but the raw scan is rather crisp also. The biggest difference I see is in the contrast of the fg reflection. Raw scan is done as a color neg (from FP4), so you'll see a dominant orange cast.

 

• 

  macfred

• Jun 25, 2017

Stunning shot - crispy and sharp ! What about the contrast - did you try your FP4 @ISO50 before ? I'm not sure what is happening here

 

• HiHoSilver

• Jun 26, 2017

'Just saw the question, Fred. My last 4 rolls of FP4 were shot at ISO50 and I like the result better, though I'd have to give the preference to PanF at ei25. Thomas Bertilsson's thread me the time/temp/dilution, though he exposed at ei 80
http://www.apug.org/forum/index.php?threads/pyrocat-hd-dev-times.144728/ post#16

 

• 

  awty

• Jun 26, 2017

Excellent Mr Silver.
I absolutely love the tones you are getting. I think I need to try some Pyro.