Dissidents

Gerold, showing color images as B&W images (converting them in photoshop) is against APUG policy.

If you are showing just the scanned negative, they should appear as closely as possible to what is on the film or on the print (if there is one).

What david said, but beyond that great shot!

I too, like your image very much. Perhaps it is better that you 'pre-visualize' your image a little more strongly. If your pre-visualization brings you to the realization that a b&w photograph would match your vision more closely than color, then by all means... come back later with b&w film. If that option is not available to you then feel free to show us the image in color. The original color that you recorded the image in. We will still appreciate the image as much and applaud you for your vision!

A great photo. With your ability of doing great B&W photos you should consider buying a bunch of B&W film

Thank you all for your feedback.
You have my apologies for my scoring of the publication policy in place here. I should say I'm new to this place and honestly didn't bother much reading into the policy small-print. Of course, I fully understand the concept of analog workflow as celebrated on this site, and in fact I do support it full-heartedly. I resort to b/w conversion only when I happen no to have b/w film with me, and a photograph comes across which just has to be b/w. But I understand, PS-tweaks are against the believes in this school, so I keep them for myself, and that's alright.
Thanks again for looking at my photographs, and I hope nobody spent sleepless nights because I brought a product into the temple which doesn't belong here. I shall publish from now only the true and straight digital transformation of the information recorded on film. Thanks for having me - I like this site a lot. Best, Gerold