A color positive film print 2

• 

  gr82bart

• Oct 6, 2008

Hmmm ... maybe it's a language thing. So I assume you scanned your transparency, right? But you don't have the ability to scan a positive, only a negative? Am I interpreting correctly? This is why you needed to "invert and colour correct"; is that right? I hope so ... because it has a nice Kodachrome look to it.

Regards, Art.

 

• 

  naknak

• Oct 6, 2008

Yes, I don't have the ability to scan 6x9 slide films. Either a 6x6. So, the only I can do, is to directly print the positive film and then, invert/correct it to see it on the web. I have no problem with 35mm transparencies. Thanks.

Kyprianos

 

• ctscanner

• Oct 6, 2008

Kyprianos.

I agree with Art, it does have a 'Kodachrome look' to it, although I would say that it also is a well done image. But in fairness, I would also say that the scanned image could do with a touch of cleanup. That will probably get the APUG police out.

George

 

• 

  naknak

• Oct 6, 2008

Thank you George. I'm with you, but let time leave his marks on a time sensitive material. That is what I thought.

Kyprianos

 

• 

  Jersey Vic

• Oct 6, 2008

This could be an advertisement and case for the reintroduction of the junior 6x9 into the Kodak product line. But it's the man behind the camera, no? Gorgeous image Kyprianos

 

• 

  naknak

• Oct 6, 2008

Thank you Vic. Photoindustry doesn't seem to be interested in the making of photographs. Taking pictures is a much better investment, they think.

Kyprianos