Untitled

• 

  thebanana

• Nov 29, 2007

The house makes the photo IMHO.

 

• 

  Anscojohn

• Nov 29, 2007

I agree with thebanana. The house is necessary as it is. However, if you wish to have a more abstract look, crop out the sky at the top. It makes a whole new picture. Either way, I think you have a winner there.

John, Mount Vernon, Virginia USA

 

• 

  semeuse

• Nov 29, 2007

agreed - the house anchors the image - great work

 

• 

  Bertus

• Nov 30, 2007

I like the white house as a strong point in this picture. Great dynamic from the lines in the grass too.

 

• 

  MarkL

• Nov 30, 2007

Really nice. The patterns are great, rising above the town. Good tonality too.

 

• 

  dlin

• Nov 30, 2007

Marvelous photograph. The compression of depth with the long focal length creates a wonderful looming feeling and sense of scale.

All the best,
Daniel

 

• pentaxuser

• Nov 30, 2007

I'd like to differ from the others' opinions about the house. I'd like to but I can't. Fits the picture down to the ground. Wouldn't work in colour but I bet you know that anyway

pentaxuser

 

• teasel321

• Nov 30, 2007

An Excellent Picture! I keep looking at this one.
Regards.

Alan.

 

• MP_Wayne

• Nov 30, 2007

Superb! The lines are compelling, but the house provides an anchor of scale and perspective on a compelling shot. The thumbnail caught my eye, and the larger version more than justifies that "eye catch". Thanks for posting.

 

• 

  MurrayMinchin

• Dec 2, 2007

Just for the heck of it, try scrolling the picture up a bit and chop off the top portion of the photograph so the sky and trees are gone. What do you think? I think it really adds to the 'abstractedness' of the fields.

Murray