Grass, Alders,Redwoods
Vaughn

Grass, Alders,Redwoods

I have always liked this image -- especially the ferns and the layering on the light into hortizontal bands. But I am curious as to how others respond to it.

It is a carbon print (homemade tissue) from an 8x10 camera negative. Exposure range was 12 to 17.5, taken at 14.

It is a scanned print.
Location
Prairie Creek Redwoods State Park
Equipment Used
deardorf 8x10, 210mm Schnieder Anglon
Exposure
F64 at 15 seconds
Film & Developer
Kodak Copy Film at 50 ASA, HC-110, 1:20 70F 7 min, constant agitation in a tray
Paper & Developer
homemade carbon
positively..... very well done...I like it...lots of texture...


Miles
 
I like the different levels of trees and field in this photo. The spot of light in the lower right adds a lot of interest and breaks the monotony of the layers. I wonder if it would be better to have included the tops of the trees. I'm never very sure about these small details but they are very important. :sad:
 
There's more to this picture than first meets the eye. Subtlety! Though much of the values are low, there is still very good detail. I like that in photos. My personal feeing on the cropping is that it is quite appropriate; by just touching the edge, it creates some nice negative spaces while allowing for space in the framed area (as opposed to cropping the trees or leaving an empty area in a featureless sky).
 
Can' say much for the technical merits of the image, the process is one I am not familiar with.
However, I only see four horizontal bands of trees, trees, grass/light grass, dark grass.. Seems like the light area on the bottom left needs something to keep the attention after it was directed there.
Sorry, I did not feel a great response to this image.
Thanks for sharing.
Regards
John
 
Masuro and Garry,

The placement of the sky took a lot of thought. Since I print full-frame with no burning or dodging, I end up spending a lot of time under the darkcloth...I feel that the edges of a print defines what is in the middle, so I spend as much time looking there as I do in the middle of the GG.

In the end I tried to get the best of both worlds -- having most of the trees come almost to the edge for visual tension, and having a couple of trees extend beyond the frame to increase the feeling of the height of these trees. I think I managed to pull it off.

John, Thanks for your comments -- unfortunately one is only able to see the image and not the print. For example the five dark clump of ferns in the lower left, because of the process, physically stand up and away from the light area behind them (the print has a raised relief, with the blacks having greater relief than mid-tones and the whites). One gets a better sense of depth viewing the print than viewing the image of the print.

It is a lot of fun to have the texture that Miles mentioned translated into a print surface that is correspondingly textured.

Vaughn
 

Media information

Category
Critique Gallery
Added by
Vaughn
Date added
View count
561
Comment count
5
Rating
0.00 star(s) 0 ratings

Image metadata

Filename
grass_alders_and_redwoods_75.jpg
File size
366.5 KB
Date taken
Tue, 20 March 2007 2:10 AM
Dimensions
773px x 614px

Share this media

Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom