Porcupine #1-9.jpg

Much better skin tone than the previous pic. This is really nice

Beautiful portraits, I have a personal preference for the Harman Phoenix one, for the somewhat "offset" tones and colors. The c200 version looks more"ordinary" to me, in terms of rendition

Acere said:

Much better skin tone than the previous pic. This is really nice

Click to expand...

Thanks! Phoenix won't be my "usual" film, but I wanted to see what it would do in the studio as most examples I've seen or outdoors of non-human subjects.

Laurent said:

Beautiful portraits, I have a personal preference for the Harman Phoenix one, for the somewhat "offset" tones and colors. The c200 version looks more"ordinary" to me, in terms of rendition

Click to expand...

Thank you, Laurent! The Phoenix does give-off a totally different "vibe," and to me, at least is a different image.

I agree with the above comments that the skin tones are much nicer with the Fujifilm. No surprise there, because Fujifilm, in my opinion, revolutionized color photography when their line of color films were introduced. Having films designed specifically for portraits, for instance, was a big innovation at the time. On the other hand, the previous picture as others have said, has a very dramatic look. but it almost looks like it was pushed processed. I'm not saying it was, but it seems to have a lot of contrast. Contrast does not always work well with portraits, but that's not fixed in stone. Two different pictures, and two different viewing experiences.