Was out on the weekend, to compare these two films. I've been using Pan F for a year now. Love it. I used to use Delta 100 quite a bit in 4x5 back in the 90's. Pan F (EI 25) is on the left. Delta 100 (EI 64) on the right. Some subtle differences. I like them both.
@SJC1952 I agree. It's such a nice film. It's the first time I developed it in Xtol (Xtol-R). I usually develop it in D23 1+3, but will probably stick with Xtol for now.
@Mainecoonmaniac I haven't done a comparison yet as far as grain goes. I'll do that tonight. One thing is clear at least to my eye is that Pan F seems to have more local contrast in this comparison. I wish they put this stuff on sheets.
That what I liked about the shot with Pan F. I plan to get a couple or rolls of Pan F 120 so I could split the roll up for my Minox spy camera my wife got me. As for my film taste, I always preferred the look of conventional films vs tabular grain films. I'm just old I guess.
@Mainecoonmaniac me too. I've always conventional films (although sometimes TMY-2 looks fantastic). Favourite for a long time has been HP5. Looks like Pan F could be my main slow film. Haven't decided if I'll settle on Xtol-R, or D23 1+3. Another test!
@NedL he suddenly came and parked right there! The road was completely empty and he decides to park there. Oh well, I thought it would add a sense of scale in the end.
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.