img295final

Patrick Robert James · Dec 22, 2015

Feeble minded people always try to put everything in a box and define it. This rule, that rule. Who gives a sh@t.I like the photograph. I think it is really well done. It has a good balance and for some reason makes me think of a mermaid. it might be a bit unconventional, but it works.Ignore the haters.

RalphLambrecht · Dec 27, 2015

blansky said:
As I mentioned in the umbrella shot, this again seems undefined in its genre. If it's a model shot, it's unflattering to the model, because you don't want to shoot into women's hips, which adds weight. Also it's printed to add more attention to her hips with the hot spot right there. If it's art nudes, then rarely do you have the model look at the photographer because it's skin as landscape, and again the uneven printing. If it's a nude portrait then again the hips and posing is a problem as is the uneven printing. So I think you need to nailed down your genre, so the pictures don't look like camera club dirty old man pictures. Figure out what you want to be, and study the genre.

I totally disagree;It's justwonderful.Although I agree to burn the hips a bit;not that that is a big deal though

bvy · Dec 27, 2015

It's right, it's wrong. If nothing else, it's real.

img295final

Patrick Robert James

RalphLambrecht

bvy

Media information

Image metadata

Share this media