May I ask you how exposed the negative was? Was it bordering on underexposure or was it almost overexposed. The reason I ask is because, even though the shadow detail is barely discernible, that could be a result of simply developing the negative more than average, thus forcing the lower tones to go black within the print's limited tonal range.
The real reason I ask is because I do like this effect, as this 'shadow loss' results in a level of contrast which imparts a feeling of brilliance. You also managed to get a sky that is realistic in tone. - David Lyga
David,
I think it was maybe due to D76 that is almost 1 year old. At 1:1, I probably should have shortened developing time by maybe 15-30 sec. It was shot in very bright sun and probably over exposed some. Thanks for your interest.
Very Brett Weston feel to this jumps out immediately. I would have never tried this photograph, which shows me how much more I have to learn about the art of photography. Great learning moment for me, Gerry.