were you trying to blow it all out? or was this a happy accident? I only ask because PanF+ shouldn't have such little detail in the tree at this size unless you cropped it a lot or if the neg was really really over exposed. Not a criticism just want to know is all, your other work is lovely and properly exposed so that's why I'm asking.
were you trying to blow it all out? or was this a happy accident? I only ask because PanF+ shouldn't have such little detail in the tree at this size unless you cropped it a lot or if the neg was really really over exposed. Not a criticism just want to know is all, your other work is lovely and properly exposed so that's why I'm asking.
The negative has a lot of detail... but this is exactly the look I wanted so I went with high contrast - but you can still find some detail on the tree. I would change the composition a bit, but there were objects just above the tree that would be visible. Of course at this contrast I could easily dodged them, which I didn't think of. On the other hand, this looks really nice framed on my wall.
were you trying to blow it all out? or was this a happy accident? I only ask because PanF+ shouldn't have such little detail in the tree at this size unless you cropped it a lot or if the neg was really really over exposed. Not a criticism just want to know is all, your other work is lovely and properly exposed so that's why I'm asking.
The negative has a lot of detail... but this is exactly the look I wanted so I went with high contrast - but you can still find some detail on the tree. I would change the composition a bit, but there were objects just above the tree that would be visible. Of course at this contrast I could easily dodged them, which I didn't think of. On the other hand, this looks really nice framed on my wall.
Thanks, I was very curious, does this have a black matte border? I feel like it would be very strong with a black border, as far as composition, well, you can always make another print