After Pontormo Jen Pd

I shot this with my old Kodak wooden 8 x 10. The negative left something to be desired, so I scanned it, did some Photoshop adjustments and made an 8 x 10 inkjet negative and palladium print.
Location
Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY
Equipment Used
Kodak D2 8 x 10, 14 inch Commercial Ektar lens
Exposure
N, R,
Film & Developer
Tri-X 320, D-19
Paper & Developer
COT 320, potassium oxalate
Hybrid Materials & Processing
Epson v850 Pro scanner. Epson Photo R3000 printer. Digital negative generated on Pictorico premium OHP transparency film.
Digital Post Processing Details
Some slight sharpening. Curves, masking, some slight brush work, then process curve for correct negative values.
I grant PHOTRIO permission to share this gallery image and previous images on their social media pages.
  1. Yes
(optional) Preferred name for image credit on social media.
Doug Schwab
Is this print for sale?
  1. Yes
Nice, did you just use natural light? Do you get better depth using an 8x10 scanned negative? All the PP prints Ive seen have used medium format negative for making a digital negative and to me dont have as much depth as they should to take full advantage of PP process, cant tell very well from an LCD screen.
 
@awty Since this is a scan from an 8 x 10 negative, it starts out smoother. Maybe more detail. But, if by depth, you mean deep shadows, I think that's a matter of negative density, which is tricky with digital negatives. I test my digital film to find the exposure for maximum black, or as some folks say, "convincing black." I never deviate from that exposure (9 min metal halide plant light.). If my print is off, I make a new negative. In my early Pt/Pd printing I used strictly camera negatives. As long as my negative had good density, I could get deep tones with a little contrast adjustment in the chemistry. So I think that sort of luscious smoothness and gentle gradations we associate with 8 x 10 negatives maybe due to the analogue film and the detail in the large format.
 
Beautiful modern rendition of "study of a pair of legs" ---
Like Jacopo's original, I could stare at this ( and have ... )
.. the photograph must sing !
Modern tech makes it so nice to be able to work on old negatives ( big or small )
and its such a treat to see your work
i always look forward to the next !
john
 
Your photos always have that little bit of naughtiness to them...nice
 
a lot of work for a little naughtiness
 
So the beginning of the semester and my work lad have kept me very busy and I haven't had a chance to check in. Thank you all for the positive comments. @awty as a teacher, I have to say it, no such thing as dumb questions.@Peter Schrager, I can't help the nastiness. A guy I hadn't sen in decades e-mailed me and asked me if I was still doing "girly" pictures. I never answered that question or contacted him again. @Saganich I can't disagree, but I thought it was worth it, and I really like printing. And a "little naughtiness" goes a long way.@jnantz Thanks, I actually bought a whole book of Pontormo's work just to have that image handy.
 

Media information

Category
Standard Gallery
Added by
artonpaper
Date added
View count
768
Comment count
10
Rating
0.00 star(s) 0 ratings

Image metadata

Filename
AfterPontormoJenPd.jpg
File size
430.4 KB
Date taken
Tue, 23 April 2019 3:14 PM
Dimensions
701px x 900px

Share this media

Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…