I've had similarly dated fujichrome 100s come back pretty thin.
it's weird, high speed films are supposed to hold up the worst yet other than one roll, I've consistently gotten very good results with them.
-
Group statistics
- Members:
- 105
- Discussions:
- 30
- Photos:
- 710
Latest photos
-
Uploaded by
removed account4 -
Uploaded by
Drew B. -
Uploaded by
Drew B. -
Uploaded by
removed account4 -
Uploaded by
pentaxpete
-
Scotch Chrome 640t, expired 1991 and imported to the States from Portugal during lockdown.<br /> I bracketed at 160 and 80 iso, but every 80 exposure turned out much better.<br /> Ricoh xr2s, metered with a gossen luna f pro, processed by AgX Imaging.
the film had surprisingly good density, so yes I could project it successfully if I had it mounted.
I've had similarly dated fujichrome 100s come back pretty thin.
it's weird, high speed films are supposed to hold up the worst yet other than one roll, I've consistently gotten very good results with them.Turned out much better as in you can project it or as in postprocessing? 
Very 'Creative' !
| Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:  |