szazs
Member
I have always been a big fan of the 1970's "F" cameras series from Canon; particularly the FTbn, EF and the F-1n (not the "New" F-1.) I am also fond of the FD S.S.C lenses available for these cameras, because of their terrific clairity and sharpness. Back when, the Nikon users in our happy little group even gave the S.S.C. lenses thumbs-up, sort of a major feat considering, the Nikon/Canon war being waged.
Anyway, someone asked me recently if I was going to use an old 35mm camera instead of a new fangled digital, why didn't I use Zeiss lenses with, say, a Rolleiflex SL35M, since, in his mind, Zeiss was "...the best you can get...WAY ahead of anything else."
Hmmm. Now, I've always been REAL happy with my modest collection of Canon S.S.C. lenses, and don't plan on ebay-ing everything and going German just yet, but, whadda ya think? Does he have a point; I mean a point worth acting on? Are they THAT much better than "everything else" or is this Canon vs. Nikon part XXXVIII all over again. If that's the case this is as far as it will go. If someone can make a "real" case, well then...
Anyway, someone asked me recently if I was going to use an old 35mm camera instead of a new fangled digital, why didn't I use Zeiss lenses with, say, a Rolleiflex SL35M, since, in his mind, Zeiss was "...the best you can get...WAY ahead of anything else."
Hmmm. Now, I've always been REAL happy with my modest collection of Canon S.S.C. lenses, and don't plan on ebay-ing everything and going German just yet, but, whadda ya think? Does he have a point; I mean a point worth acting on? Are they THAT much better than "everything else" or is this Canon vs. Nikon part XXXVIII all over again. If that's the case this is as far as it will go. If someone can make a "real" case, well then...