Yasuhara T-981

Sciuridae II

A
Sciuridae II

  • 0
  • 0
  • 14
Untitled

H
Untitled

  • 1
  • 0
  • 24
Between two trees.

H
Between two trees.

  • 0
  • 0
  • 18
Stark

A
Stark

  • 9
  • 6
  • 111

Forum statistics

Threads
197,725
Messages
2,763,385
Members
99,453
Latest member
Minihdoka
Recent bookmarks
1
Joined
Jul 28, 2005
Messages
1,603
Location
Iowa
Format
Multi Format
I saw the price on the Lomography site and cringed. Granted, it's a pretty nice camera and that includes the lens, but I thought that they were cheaper than that originally. Can anyone tell me ANYTHING about this camera? I shot a PM to Stephen Gandy over on RFF to see if he could shed some light as to whether or not he has some left over.
 

polaski

Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2006
Messages
104
Location
Philadelphia
Format
35mm
The price is very much out of line

The research I did into the Yasuhara indicated that the man wanted to produce a Leica-type rangefinder, and let the design and production costs get seriously out of control.

Consina stole the guy's march by reengineering a cheap, proven SLR body into a rangefinder body. I have a CV Bessa R with Leica thread mount Cosina (CV) lenses and they all perform very well together at 1/3 to 1/4 the cost of equivilent used Leica equipment. (The word "equivilent" would upset Leica Forum members, but when I can get 85% of the quality for 35% of the price, it's a no brainer. Gandy goes into that in detail.)

Were the Lomography folks marketing the Asuhara? If so, he's running out of marketing channels.
 
OP
OP
Stephanie Brim
Joined
Jul 28, 2005
Messages
1,603
Location
Iowa
Format
Multi Format
Yes.

If I'm going to get a Leica mount rangefinder it's going to be an actual Leica. This would have just been yet another body for my Russian lenses. But not at $600. I'm pondering saving for an M body now...seems to be the best way to go. Most likely an M3.

I'm a Leicaphile myself. I know the Voigtlander equipment is good, but when I can get an M3 for the same amount used as a new R2/3A, I don't really see why I shouldn't get the Leica.
 

Paul Sorensen

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 15, 2004
Messages
1,912
Location
Saint Paul, MN
Format
Multi Format
Keep in mind that the Lomography folks try to sell a color flash Holga for $70 when freestyle sells it for $35. (They do throw in a roll of film and two AA batteries for the extra $35:smile:) There might be a less expensive source out there.
 
OP
OP
Stephanie Brim
Joined
Jul 28, 2005
Messages
1,603
Location
Iowa
Format
Multi Format
Asked Stephen Gandy and he hasn't seen anymore. He also says that they suffer from light leaks...maybe they *were* made for the Lomo crowd. :tongue:
 

Lachlan Young

Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2005
Messages
4,845
Location
Glasgow
Format
Multi Format
Stephanie Brim said:
Asked Stephen Gandy and he hasn't seen anymore. He also says that they suffer from light leaks...maybe they *were* made for the Lomo crowd. :tongue:

According to Stephen Gandy the Copal shutter on the Yasuhara is not entirely light tight - unlike the cosina voigtlander which uses a double shutter to ensure light tightness. Apparently this is a problem which only afflicts focal plane metal shutters - cloth Leica type shutters are unaffected. I would suggest buying a Voigtlander instead.

Hope this helps,
Lachlan
 

Uncle Bill

Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
1,395
Location
Oakville and
Format
Multi Format
Stephanie,
At $600+Us I would just hold off save more money and get a Leica M3. Then again I am biased as I have an M3.

Bill
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom