Would you buy a camera that you know hasnt been used for a long time?

Brentwood Kebab!

A
Brentwood Kebab!

  • 1
  • 1
  • 82
Summer Lady

A
Summer Lady

  • 2
  • 1
  • 111
DINO Acting Up !

A
DINO Acting Up !

  • 2
  • 0
  • 62
What Have They Seen?

A
What Have They Seen?

  • 0
  • 0
  • 76
Lady With Attitude !

A
Lady With Attitude !

  • 0
  • 0
  • 63

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,780
Messages
2,780,749
Members
99,703
Latest member
heartlesstwyla
Recent bookmarks
0

BennyK

Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2012
Messages
20
Format
Medium Format
Hi Guys , I'm still shopping for a Mamiya 645E.

I have found one that I have been told hasn't been used for at least 4 years. This guy got sick and died and the son found the camera and is selling the estate.

He does offer 7 day return.

What do you think? It looks mint in box with all accessories manuals and papers etc.

How bad would non-use affect this camera?
 

CGW

Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2010
Messages
2,896
Format
Medium Format
Assuming non-hostile storage conditions, I'd say buy it if it's what amounts to NOS. The only plausible issues would be a fungus-ridden lens or a crapped-up battery compartment if the cell ruptured. If it's busted, ship it back within the 7 day return window.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

paul ron

Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2004
Messages
2,706
Location
NYC
Format
Medium Format
If the camera is in mint condition, it most likely was well cared for. BUT... do expect to do the basic routine CLA on it anyway. The seals are probably ready to be changed anyway n a going over will only di it good. So if the price reasonable n in your budget, it may be one of those lurker great deals I only dream of.


.
 

CGW

Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2010
Messages
2,896
Format
Medium Format
If the camera is in mint condition, it most likely was well cared for. BUT... do expect to do the basic routine CLA on it anyway. The seals are probably ready to be changed anyway n a going over will only di it good. So if the price reasonable n in your budget, it may be one of those lurker great deals I only dream of.


.

Got a boxed NOS Mamiya RB67 Pro S body kit a 3 years back that I assume was an unused back-up that sat for 20+ years. DIY seal job on the RB adapter and back was all it needed. All for $120 and I'm still smilin'.
 
Joined
Oct 29, 2006
Messages
4,829
Location
İstanbul
Format
35mm
I bought a 1946 Leica III C with Elmar 5 cms from a family which has not used for past 60 years. It was working like new. It all depends on the quality of craftmanship of the camera.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,890
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
How bad would non-use affect this camera?

Better than a used and abused camera.

The 645E is of relatively recent vintage, so it wouldn't be as bad as a 40+ year old camera that had sat unused for a long time.

Does it have the standard hand crank, or the thumb operated "rapid" winder, or both?

Check the camera and lens for signs of excessive dirt, visible migrating lubricant, excessive wear, mould or battery leakage/corrosion. If you don't see any of these problems, and the camera appears to function well with film in it, as long as you budget for a CLA, it should end up to be a good choice.

For the purposes of comparison, KEH is currently offering an EX graded 645E with lens and standard hand crank for $354: Dead Link Removed
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2003
Messages
4,924
Location
San Francisco
Format
Multi Format
Personally I would not unless it was a screaming good deal and the return policy was rock solid. I learned the hard way when I bought an SL66 kits from a guy in the UK (I'm in the US) who similarly to this situation was selling off his late father's kit he found in storage and was not sure how long since it was last used. He said it looked and seemed to work fine, and photos of the camera looked alright. When I got it the musty/moldy smell as I opening the shipping box was my first clue. The camera leather had mildew, the lens had spider-webs of fungus and while the shutter fired it needed some serious work and had pinholes in the curtains. Was not worth the $200 less I paid than if I bought such off a photographer or from a shop with a return policy. Jurgen Kushnik did a decent job on it before he went back to Germany from LA but in the end it was not worth all the trouble as I really go less for more...
 

jscott

Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2010
Messages
113
Location
PNW
Format
Multi Format
4 years with a 7 day return sounds like a slam-dunk (if its really what you want).

It's the 40+ year ones "as is" that are very risky.
 

tkamiya

Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2009
Messages
4,284
Location
Central Flor
Format
Multi Format
If the deal is good enough and 7 day return privilege will actually be honored, it is perhaps a worth-while risk to take.

Just remember, you are talking about a camera that is plentiful in used market. If, at any point, you feel uneasy, don't. There are many more of those available.

4 years in an air-conditioned room is nothing to worry about. 4 weeks in a humid basement or a really hot attic can be problematic. You are also dealing with someone who wasn't a direct owner of the piece. So any history you may get of the piece is merely an observation.
 
Joined
Mar 30, 2011
Messages
2,147
Location
NYC
Format
Multi Format
Im always wary from buying from estate sales and such, most of the time the people selling it do not know what they are talking about. Other times I think about how attached people could have been to objects in their former lives, kinda creepy if it came with a ghost as well.
 
OP
OP

BennyK

Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2012
Messages
20
Format
Medium Format
Thanks for all the replies and opinions greatly appreciate them.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom