Which finish?

Kodachrome Skies

A
Kodachrome Skies

  • 1
  • 0
  • 101
The Dive

A
The Dive

  • 4
  • 2
  • 134
Edinburgh nights

Edinburgh nights

  • 1
  • 6
  • 187

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
178,732
Messages
2,458,845
Members
94,629
Latest member
swededreams
Recent bookmarks
0

TPPhotog

Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
3,041
Shooter
Multi Format
I'm been burning the midnight oil recently working with matt and glossy fibre, but can't really decide which I prefer.

The matt gives me a look which I suppose I tend to think of as that "illusive fine art look", also good tonal range, natural looking deep blacks, reasonably bright highlights and a feel I can't describe.

The glossy also gives me good tonal range, not so natural deep blacks but with brighter highlights and of course a shine that make reflections look more natural.

So which finish do you prefer and why?
 

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
19,852
Location
Honolulu, Ha
Shooter
Large Format
It probably depends on the particular brand of paper, but I generally like glossy fiber that's been allowed to dry naturally (as opposed to ferrotyped). Matte finish is sometimes okay, but I find it usually dulls the blacks a bit. On the other hand, that can work for some prints.
 

rbarker

Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
2,218
Location
Rio Rancho,
Shooter
Multi Format
Another vote for glossy paper dried matte.
 

Lee Shively

Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2004
Messages
1,324
Location
Louisiana, U
Shooter
Multi Format
I kinda like matte better than air-dried glossy but, as already stated, it depends. Right now, all I have in my darkroom is matte fiber paper and pearl surface RC.
 
OP
OP

TPPhotog

Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
3,041
Shooter
Multi Format
I guess it does depend on the final use so maybe I'm just printing things that should be on Matt at the moment. All my stuff is air dried as I don't have a dryer.

Lee I've heard that Pearl RC looks almost similar to Fibre if selenium toned, have you tried that combo yet?

Sparx so why Matt for you?
 

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
19,852
Location
Honolulu, Ha
Shooter
Large Format
I've used Pearl RC, and it's my preference for RC, but it doesn't look anything like fibre, even if selenium toned. It's its own look. If you have any postcards I've printed, they are mostly on Pearl RC.
 

Lee Shively

Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2004
Messages
1,324
Location
Louisiana, U
Shooter
Multi Format
The pearl surface Ilford MG IV RC doesn't take much if any color from selenium but the toner does remove the slightly green tint in the paper. I honestly never noticed this green tint until I compared untoned prints to selenium toned ones. The pearl Ilford WT RC tones beautifully at whatever dilution you want. It's like a well-trained puppy in selenium--it sits up, rolls over, speaks and does anything to please you. Virtually the same as the glossy fiber. Both the WT fiber and RC also look gorgeous in Nelson gold toner but it's a labor intensive toner that's used hot.

I recently bought a lot of other brands of fiber paper to try out (all matte or semi-matte). I'm hoping to get some quality darkroom time over the next month or so and do a little experiementation with the Nelson gold and selenium.
 

Donald Miller

Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2002
Messages
6,233
Shooter
Large Format
TPPhotog said:
I guess it does depend on the final use so maybe I'm just printing things that should be on Matt at the moment. All my stuff is air dried as I don't have a dryer.

Lee I've heard that Pearl RC looks almost similar to Fibre if selenium toned, have you tried that combo yet?

Sparx so why Matt for you?

Anything on RC does not come anywhere near what fiber paper is. RC does not tone as effectively. Beyond the toning considerations, the blacks do not exhibit the dmax of fiber (as substantiated by densitometric evaluation).

In my estimation RC is for throw away work. Personally, I print everything that I print on glossy air dried paper...that means work prints and fine prints. The enlarging papers that I favor are Seagull graded (slightly better dmax then VC) and VC for neutral toned and Forte (JandC Classic) for warm toned images. For contact printing I do Azo.
 

mobtown_4x5

Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2004
Messages
243
Location
Baltimore
Shooter
4x5 Format
Glossy seems to have more depth to the blacks for me- maybe this is just an optical illusion? OTOH, too much gloss can be a bad thing- I guess it depends on the subject matter.

Strange but true confession:

I also sometimes use carnuba wax on matte prints- I have gotten several positive compliments on the resulting surface- but it is a lot of work, and may not be archival? Anyone else ever tried waxing or am I a real weirdo on this one? :smile:
 

Tom Duffy

Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Messages
969
Location
New Jersey
I find that David Goldfarb speaks for most of us on most things... :smile:

besides wax, people also use oil or varnish to "finish" matte paper. Does anyone know more about how you would do this?
 

djklmnop

Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2004
Messages
230
Shooter
4x5 Format
I usually use glossy for landscape work since it is more revealing. For portrait work, I prefer matte. It feels like cotton and looks like a painting.
 

oriecat

Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2004
Messages
241
Location
Portland, OR
Shooter
35mm
I prefer pearl, I have been using RC. I do have a box of glossy that I've been using, only because it was given to me free. :smile: I also have some matte FB and I want to get some more FB, not sure what I will try first. How does drying FB differently change the finish? I wasn't aware of that. I don't have a dryer so anything would be air dried.
 
OP
OP

TPPhotog

Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
3,041
Shooter
Multi Format
Alas I feel my printing is only good enough for myself and the acknowledgeable pub so I haven't reached the stage of being confident to take part in the postcard exchange yet.

I think for me the comment on Matt that "It feels like cotton and looks like a painting" has hit the nail on the head, possibly a timeless look. The waxing of Matt prints sounds quite intriguing.

I think I may try Pearl RC selenium toned on prints smaller than 8"x10". Must admit I think I'm getting a fibre fetish as I loved RC until I printed lots of fibre in succession. Now RC feels stiff and lifeless when I'm working with it and isn't as pleasurable.

Many thanks for your thoughts and experience once again everyone, it's been as always very informative and enlightening :smile:
 

mikeb_z5

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2004
Messages
217
Shooter
4x5 Format
I've been using the Pearl RC as well and prefer it over glossy for rc. I've been using KRST 1:5 for 4-5 mins and it seems to tone ok for me. But what do I know I'm a newb :smile: . Ymmv,

Mike
 
OP
OP

TPPhotog

Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
3,041
Shooter
Multi Format
mikeb_z5 said:
I've been using the Pearl RC as well and prefer it over glossy for rc. I've been using KRST 1:5 for 4-5 mins and it seems to tone ok for me. But what do I know I'm a newb :smile: . Ymmv,

Mike
Greetings and welcome then Mike :smile: I loved Pearl RC untoned until I got onto fibre, but I'll give it a go with toned for my smaller prints to see how it looks. thank you for the dilution and times :wink:
 

papagene

Membership Council
Council
Joined
Jun 11, 2004
Messages
5,432
Location
Tucson, AZ
Shooter
Multi Format
Tony,
I prefer FB glossy, air dried for my important images. For non-important stuff, I use MG IV Pearl.
I have played around with MG FB Warmtone (glossy) and like it very much. I like having the choice between those two papers.
$0.02 deposited.

gene
 
OP
OP

TPPhotog

Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
3,041
Shooter
Multi Format
James I've thought about that, but if possible I'd like to create a consistent look accross my work. I may be hoping or expecting too much being able to print all pictures on the same finish but different grades of course.

Gene the warmtone does bring in another variable of course as again it's a beautiful material to work with.

Many thanks to you both for your comments :wink:
 

ann

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 10, 2002
Messages
3,332
Shooter
35mm
Matt works well for handcoloring as the dmax is less and it has some tooth.

Other than that I would neither use that surface nor RC. Basically , I use graded fiber glossy papers. Finish prints are always toned. Finished means ready for the wall or for the buyer.
 
OP
OP

TPPhotog

Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
3,041
Shooter
Multi Format
Thank you Ann, it's looking like Glossy Fibre is the favourite choice with most people. I always remember that when I tell people I shoot and print traditional b&w they always comment on the beautiful shades and shine they associate with it. Happily I won't be doing professional stuff anymore so no need to worry about buyers :D
 

sparx

Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2004
Messages
376
Location
Norfolk UK
Shooter
Medium Format
TPPhotog said:
Sparx so why Matt for you?
I just like the look and feel of the matt paper better. I've used Jessops matt and Ilford pearl as well as the gloss from both these companies and, like i said, matt every time. I find the image harder to focus on with gloss because of the additional reflection and i also think you lose some detail and grain, especially when shooting faster film.

Just my opinion of course.
 

tomishakishi2

Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2004
Messages
40
Shooter
Multi Format
Air dried glossy 95% of the time. Far greater depth for landscapes, which IMHO is essential. I use matt for some portraits. I dont feel Matt has that 'walk in' feel.

Tom
 

Sjixxxy

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2004
Messages
433
Location
Zenith City,
Shooter
8x10 Format
When I was taking photo classes back in college I grew a strong distaste for Glossy RC. I never liked the way it felt, and it annoyed me to no end during critiques since I could never seem to find a position to look at them without having a glare obscuring half the image. So I ended up working with pearl and semi-matte for RC which I like.

When I started doing Fiber work I went strait to matte because of the bad taste the glossy rc left me. But last night I made my first Glossy Fiber prints, and damn, I like them. Glossy on fiber seems to be a much different beast then glossy on RC.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab
Top Bottom