My Rolleiflex gets me a lot of attention. It has also opened doors, so to speak, for me and got me into some very unusual places.
As an architect (now retired), when my practice started making money in the late 1990s I put away my beloved 3.5 E2 and invested big time in Hasselblad. As such addictions do when control flies out the window, this grew and grew and in time I had a 501C, two 500CMs and FOUR ELs. The latter being the only camera(s) that got me kicked out of a National Trust heritage listed church in Melbourne for 'disturbing' a funeral service by the EL film winding noise - GRRWRRKLUNK!
In time common sense and okay, sanity returned and offloaded the lot (the Hasselblads, not my Rolleis). I do wish I had kept the 501CM but we all make such mistakes. Nor am I at all keen to buy another. My 'flex keeps me occupied and happy and 120 roll film is now so expensive in Australia anyway...
I never did get into 4x5 or any view camera as I have an odd visual (or mental) quirk and cannot compose an upside down image.
Let me say that Rolleis are the last camera any sane architect should consider for architecturals. A few good accessories were made to ease the burden (I have two F&H panorama heads with spirit levels which make 95% of my shooting easier) but photography like much of life is about compromises. I plan and compose carefully and use slow films (Ilford FP4 is my favorite) and raise the enlarger that much higher when printing.
Aussies are much more laid back about photography and privacy invasion (at least in public) than the more neurotic Europeans and certainly North Americans. Street shooting has lately become somewhat of an issue here and the laws tend to favor the subjects over the photographers. For my architectural shoots I pass as a rather daggy over-70 geezer with odd equipment, a film camera with levers and wheels and gears and gadgets and TWO lenses and that fascinating object, a tripod. So I get by. Haven't been threatened with arrest yet. I think I would rather enjoy that, being cantankerous and somewhat forcible in discussion (I never argue or for that matter agree with most anyone about mostly anything) by nature.
The only time I was ever evicted from a site (other than the aforementioned church) was in 1994 when I was shooting in Sydney, a high rise designed by the (rightly) renowned Austalian architect (the late) Harry Seidler. I had set up for a vertical shot when the Great Man in person and larger than life as he was, came stomping out of the building and demanded that I cease and desist. Which I did. He claimed the site was "copyrighted by me" (him) and I had no right to be there it with my equipment. He did add, "nice camera, by the way" as he left. I've read he was a Leica M3 man. He was clever and let the equally renowned Sydney photographer Max Dupain shoot all his projects. Those images are immortal.
A few days later I went back and got my shot. Herr Seidler was nowhere to be seen. Those slides are somewhere in my archives. I keep them as a reminder that we are all human and all humans have bad days. Even the great.