What's wrong with my scanning technique?

Discussion in 'Miscellaneous Equipment' started by ted_smith, Feb 5, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. ted_smith

    ted_smith Member
    Ads Enabled

    Messages:
    495
    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2008
    Location:
    uk
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Hi

    Please compare the two images below.

    The first is a 'standard' (as opposed to pro) 4Mb scan of a Fuji Velvia 100 35mm exposure done by my pro lab that they burned to CD, along with the rest of the film.

    The second is a 600dpi 24-bit RGB scan of the same transparency using my own Nikon LS-2000 film scanner with a 'landscape' colour balance selected during the scan process. I've done nothing else with it, either in the scan software or afterwards, and I accepted the defaults of the scanning software more or less, which is VueScan, version 8.5.01 (www.hamrick.com).

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    I realise I could correct it with sharpening etc, but the two scans are so different, and I expect the pro lab are only using default values too, so where I am I going wrong? Surely it's not just down to the fact they will be using a much better scanner, or is there really that much of a difference?

    Where am I going wrong? What are the pro lab doing that I am not?

    Ted
     
  2. OP
    OP
    ted_smith

    ted_smith Member
    Ads Enabled

    Messages:
    495
    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2008
    Location:
    uk
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    NB - Anyone who has read this in the first couple of minutes since posting, I have re-done the scan using 'Colour Balance : Auto Levels' as opposed to landscape, which has made the water look whiter, but still, it's not great,
     
  3. jd callow

    jd callow Moderator Staff Member Moderator
    Ads Enabled

    Messages:
    8,433
    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2003
    Location:
    Milan
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Ted this is really pretty much out of scope for APUG. You'll get better answers on http://www.Hybridphoto.com or any general photog site.
     
  4. OP
    OP
    ted_smith

    ted_smith Member
    Ads Enabled

    Messages:
    495
    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2008
    Location:
    uk
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Yes, fair point. I have posted it there instead. Thanks
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies. If you have a Photrio account, please log in (and select 'stay logged in') to prevent recurrence of this notice.