What is the difference betwwen Parformaldehyde and Paraformaldehyde sodium bisulphite

about to extinct

D
about to extinct

  • 0
  • 0
  • 22
Fantasyland!

D
Fantasyland!

  • 9
  • 2
  • 97
perfect cirkel

D
perfect cirkel

  • 2
  • 1
  • 121
Thomas J Walls cafe.

A
Thomas J Walls cafe.

  • 4
  • 6
  • 281

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,745
Messages
2,780,275
Members
99,693
Latest member
lachanalia
Recent bookmarks
0
Joined
Sep 1, 2008
Messages
145
Location
Toronto, Can
Format
Medium Format
I know it seems like a dumb question, different names etc. What I am looking for is if there is a way of substituting one for the other or making the Paraformaldehyde sodium bisulphite.

Thanks!

Marek
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
Well, paraformaldehyde is a white solid that is a polymer of formaldehyde. Sodium Formaldehyde bisulfite is called an "adduct". It is a while solid also that is a loose chemical combination of formaldehyde and Sodium Bisulfite. The Adduct is soluble in water and the polymer generally is not. Both decompose into formalin, but the adduct also gives Sodium Sulfite in solution. There is no such thing as Sodium Parformaldehyde Bislufite.

There is Trioxymethylene which is a trimer of Formaldehyde. It is made up of 3 molecules of Formaldehyde in a ring structure.

They are all inter convertible with the right conditions, usually alkali or acid.

PE
 
OP
OP
Marek Warunkiewicz
Joined
Sep 1, 2008
Messages
145
Location
Toronto, Can
Format
Medium Format
Thanks for your answer! This is the formula I am trying to make:

PACKO LITH DEVELOPER

Water (< 32 C) 500 ml
Sodium Sulfite (anhydrous) 3.0 gr
Sodium Formaldehyde bisulphite 25.0 gr
Hydroquinone 12.0 gr
Sodium Bromide 2.6 gr
Sodium Carbonate (monohydrate) 23.0 gr
Ascorbic Acid 5 gr
Cold water to make 1 L

So the "Sodium Formaldehyde bisulphite" confused me. Should I just add 45 Gr of Paraformaldehyde and not worry?

Thanks!

Marek
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
Some of the buffering and sulfite in the developer is coming from the adduct so NO, use of Paraforomaldehyde is not exactly equivalent and I don't know for sure what the change will do! I suggest that you get the adduct and use it, or learn to make it using the wikipedia references. There was a long discourse about this here with references.

PE
 

An Le-qun

Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
82
Format
4x5 Format
Marek,
ChlorAmEx (I think I have the spelling right) is Sodium Formaldehyde bisulfite. It is available here: http://www.angelsplus.com/SuppliesWater.htm
It's sold as an ammonia remover for fish tanks. Not expensive, and IMHO easier to work with than any of the other options for the buffer in this formula.
Cheers!
An
 

nworth

Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2005
Messages
2,228
Location
Los Alamos,
Format
Multi Format
Paraformaldehyde-hydroquinone developers were once very popular for lithographic work. They were rumored to be cleaner working than other formulas and had the advantage of hardening the emulsion a bit. Paraformaldehyde is soluble in alkalies, and sodium sulfite is apparently alkaline enough to do the job. It would probably be possible to make an equivalent solution by dissolving paraformaldehye in the appropriate amount of sodium sulfite and then adjusting the pH of the final solution. A fairly similar developer to the one you showed appeared in a 40s era Photo Lab Index:

Water (<90F) 500 ml
Sodium sulfite (anh) 30 g
Paraformaldehyde 7.5 g
Potassium metabisulfite 2.6 g
Boric acid (crystals) 7.5 g
Hydroquinone 22.5 g
Potassium bromide 1.6 g
Water to make 1 l

Something more similar to the Packo formula might start with the Packo formula, but using 25 g of sodium sulfite, 5 g of paraformaldehyde, and three 3 g of sodium metabisulfite instead of the quantities of sodium sulfite and sodium formaldehyse bisulfite listed.
 

Gerald C Koch

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
High contrast paraformaldehyde developers work because the formaldehyde combines with sulfite ions and keeps the sulfite ion level very low. This promotes infectious development which causes high contrast. Paraformaldehyde and its sulfite adduct are not interchangeable unless the compositions of the developers are changed. The adduct already contains sulfite and so cannot remove any more.
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
Just a bit of clarification.

Paraformaldehyde does not form an adduct with sulfite. If it is decomposed by acid in the presence of bisulfite then it can form the Formaldehyde bisulfite addition product (adduct). This is due to the fact that paraformaldehyde decomposes into formaldehyde in acid and then reacts with bisulfite.

The bisulfite adduct reversibly decomposes into formalin and sulfite - bisulfite, and the ratio of the latter two is dependent on the pH of the solution.

This decomposition is taken advantage of in the developers being discussed and in the E6 pre-bleach to yield formalin, but for widely different purposes.

PE
 

Gerald C Koch

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
PE is correct! Thanks. I should have proof read my post better. The process is a bit confusing for in one case you are speaking of sulfite and in another bisulfite.
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
Jerry;

I don't blame you one bit. This is a messy area of chemistry and I had to look it up even though I did some Research on it for an EK patent years ago.

PE
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom