Now I do not want to start a discussion of beliefs and maybe this has been covered already. I was just reading some stuff from Steve Anchell where he claims Tri-X is better than T-max. That is how I understand it unless I missed something. He wrote if I am allowed to quote "The reason is that the thin, flat grains of silver literally do not have the depth of rounded pebble shape grains which enable them to record microscopic variations in contrast. In other words, the flatter the grain the less capable it is of recording micro-contrast." Now I am sure that the new Tri-X is more similar to T-Max than the original Tri-X. I would just like to hear a few viewpoints of others regarding this.