The funniest thing I've seen in a while--iPhone SLR.

kminov

Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Messages
76
Location
Sofia,Bulgaria
Format
35mm
“With a smartphone and some easy-to-use lenses, they don’t need to know anything about photography or lighting to take great pictures."

that right there is the problem of modern day "photographers"
 

nhemann

Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2011
Messages
206
Location
NJ - Near NY
Format
Multi Format
on the photojojo site Dead Link Removed they show them mounted on keyrings and chains so you can wear your optics sytem. Wish I could do that with some of "real" lenses (if you could only see how hi my nose is pointed right now!) lol

Fun stuff.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,359
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
billbretz said:
Funny? Why?
Click to expand...

I will draw a picture for you:
Take a low resolution device with a relatively low cost
Spend lots of money to buy high quality optical equipment
Spend more money for adpation equipment
Result: A crappy low resolution image.​
 

MaximusM3

Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2010
Messages
754
Location
NY
Format
35mm RF
Sirius Glass said:
I will draw a picture for you:
Take a low resolution device with a relatively low cost
Spend lots of money to buy high quality optical equipment
Spend more money for adpation equipment
Result: A crappy low resolution image.​
Click to expand...

I don't know if that stands. It would imply that low resolution means a crappy image, which couldn't be father from the truth. If that was so, then loads of grainy film images or lith prints would fall under that realm. There are PLENTY of crappy images on film, being spit out with equipment worth thousands, sharp and of the highest resolution.

I draw this:

Take a low speed, high resolution film of relatively low cost
Spend LOTS of money to buy high quality optical equipment
Result: a crappy high resolution image

So, what's the difference? Both are crappy images and the film guy actually spent more money since he's buying rolls at probably $4 per and blowing through it like water.
 

removed account4

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,832
Format
Hybrid
i don't know about crappy photographs,
stephen schaub makes some beautiful images

one could draw the parallel between getting a low-fi / plastic, holga,
meniscus, or lens baby lens and using it on a "nice" body ...


the tripod is kind of funny though ...
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,359
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
MaximusM3 said:
So, what's the difference? Both are crappy images and the film guy actually spent more money since he's buying rolls at probably $4 per and blowing through it like water.
Click to expand...

While working at Kodak, I took a class on the "Image Quality Chain". In the class, rule number one is only improve the weakest link of the chain, improving any other link in the chain will not make an appreciable difference.

Basically we are saying the same thing. My point though was to explain the humor to billbretz et al whom did not see the humor.
 

billbretz

Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2007
Messages
264
Format
Multi Format
Sirius Glass said:
My point though was to explain the humor to billbretz et al whom did not see the humor.
Click to expand...

I think you know I understood the point of the "humor."

What you don't realize is that a lot of folks make a lot of pictures with cell phones, happily enjoying the results. Lots of folks will find fun, interesting, artistic, maybe even meaningful ways to use these laughable products.

And we can debate whether the resolution is "crappy." Frankly, for a lot of uses, it is quite good.

Real world: I work as a photojournalist for a newspaper/online news resource. We are trying to stay relevant and employed. One way to do that is immediacy. The tools being discussed here can help me stay relevant. It is especially helpful considering a lot of that "high quality optical equipment" is already in the trunk of my car.

Yeah, I can use that. Nothing funny about that. Laugh if you like, I call it working.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,359
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
bill,

I find digital imaging good for six situations:
1. Journalism: When the boss want the images before the image was taken.
2. Weddings: The Brides want the digitial images of the wedding before the wedding has taken place.
3. Posting images for eBay.
4. Posting images of mechanical problems on line when one needs help fast.
5. Infrared photography: Ever since the demise of HIE, digital does infrared imaging better.
6. Remote sensing: Example, Voyager I's and Voyager II's image collection at Jupiter and Saturn.​
 

billbretz

Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2007
Messages
264
Format
Multi Format
One last thing from me (we hope!)... Sorry to the OP and other posters for steering this thread awry... the image of a 300 on an iPhone is comical on its face, I agree. I know I have been dissuaded from participating in forums because of strongly negative reactions to some things I've offered, so, I hope I haven't been too much of a killjoy.
 
OP
OP

brent8927

Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2005
Messages
465
Location
CA Central Coast
Format
Medium Format

I think you actually made a good point. Personally what I found funny was the excessiveness--the 300 on the Berlebach tripod, etc. It just seems to defeat the entire advantage that a cell-phone camera has--ease of portability. I think cell phone cameras and point-and-shoots are great for that--the best camera is the one you have with you, and I know when I was shooting 4x5, I only brought that with me when I was intending to go shoot some photos. Personally I don't have a iPhone or pocket point-and-shoot, but I would because I can't always have my Hasselblad with me, and frankly, sometimes it'd be nice to have a spontaneous photo of my wife and I when we go out. Sure the quality of an iPhone isn't up to par with Zeiss, Rodekstock, Schneider, etc., but it's good enough.

So, I'm totally in favor of people having fun with this--if people are willing to pay for the equipment, and it gets them excited about photography, I'm completely in favor. But I certainly still find many of the photos hilarious!!!
 

bdial

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 2, 2005
Messages
7,466
Location
North East U.S.
Format
Multi Format
I do like the part about "they don’t need to know anything about photography or lighting to take great pictures...".
The little keyring kit I understand, but if you're going to carry a 300 tele, an slr body doesn't add much to the kit vs. the phone.
 

kminov

Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Messages
76
Location
Sofia,Bulgaria
Format
35mm
While you are absolutely right, it takes more than a good eye (although the eye being indispensable) to make a good photo. Besides you are comparing analog liths with digi something. While the analog liths are 1:1 or close to what the lenses see the digi is something like 25:1, and everything like tones and grays are also 25:1. Or worse. The whole concept is senile, the little digi sensor could never possibly use those lens as they were meant to be used.


 

removed account4

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,832
Format
Hybrid


the thing that i think is funny about that statement is the absolute truth in it !
before people become "serious" photographers they take some of their best photographs
they have no knowledge of fstops, lighting technical BS &c, they are free to point and press ...
when people have all that "stuff" on their mind they no longer have an invisible barrier between
their camera and them, they have all the tech-stuff working as a barrier.

i hope these funny little lenses on people's phones make a difference in their images!
 

Richard S. (rich815)

Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2003
Messages
4,924
Location
San Francisco
Format
Multi Format
I still use "serious" cameras and doubt I'll ever drop using B&W film but one of my most success print and usage sales lately is from one of my fairly recent iPhone images, over $900 and counting....not so funny anymore. As for money spent? Heck it's my phone and mini-internet browser with loads of apps anyway, oh, and has an 8MP camera that I sometimes use BECAUSE I HAPPEN TO HAVE IT WITH ME.

I think the hubris I'm seeing here is funnier...
 

JBrunner

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Dec 14, 2005
Messages
7,429
Location
PNdub
Format
Medium Format
I don't care how someone makes an image, and I use my phone to make picture all the time. But for the life of me I can't figure out why I would want to drag around a bunch of lenses without just bringing along a camera body that uses them. It's not like an itty bitty sensor brings anything to the table that using full size lenses takes advantage of or benefits from. I think this is just mostly a case of marketing genius. Creating a need that doesn't exist and then filling it is a long, lucrative, and brilliant enterprise zone. Maybe Canon should just build a cell phone into their next body LOL.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Thomas Bertilsson

Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2003
Messages
15,708
Location
Switzerland
Format
Multi Format
Mostly because you have a teeny tiny device that is designed to be practical and nimble, and 'all-in-one device', both with its capabilities and its size. Then you completely throw out the original idea of the device, mount a fairly extreme lens to it via some sort of lens mount that doesn't destroy the camera, and finally put it on a tripod.

It's the idea of going to the length they have to make that with an iPhone. That's the funny part. It's disproportionate, a bit nuts, and a bonkers way of building a working camera system.

billbretz said:
Funny? Why?
Click to expand...
 

Richard S. (rich815)

Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2003
Messages
4,924
Location
San Francisco
Format
Multi Format
It's obvious these attachments and lenses are not for us with other cameras but for people who only have iPhones and have no interest in buying other cameras and who may want to use such attachments and lenses. No big deal, makes perfect sense.
 

pbromaghin

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 30, 2010
Messages
3,807
Location
Castle Rock, CO
Format
Multi Format
The big lenses are a weird idea, but the kit of 3 little lenses (fisheye, wide angle, and a telephoto) looks pretty good. I showed it to my wife and she got real excited. She got an iPhone 4s a couple weeks ago and has mentioned that it would be good if it had some kind of zoom capability. They would fit nicely in her purse.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…