rfshootist
Member
I had always thought, a manual Rangefinder would not be fast enuff for sport, my newest experience is different. The truth is, if it's getting too fast the AF SLR is to slow, not the manual camera.
I took both to a cycle racing track recently , the bikes and the Dernys passed me with about 45 mls/h, and the amateur AF of the F80 gave up completely. No way. Maybe a F6 would have doen better, I doubt tho. I had to prefocus on the "decisive point" and fire when the bikes arrived there, exactly as I had to do it with the Bessa R .
When it got dark I put the SLR in the back, completely useless then with the f 3,5 zoom . Which I did not need either, a 50mm and a 75 was enuff as it turned out later.
There is nothing better than practical expereince, never listen to folks who havemn't really done it. No matter what it could be.
Bertram
I took both to a cycle racing track recently , the bikes and the Dernys passed me with about 45 mls/h, and the amateur AF of the F80 gave up completely. No way. Maybe a F6 would have doen better, I doubt tho. I had to prefocus on the "decisive point" and fire when the bikes arrived there, exactly as I had to do it with the Bessa R .
When it got dark I put the SLR in the back, completely useless then with the f 3,5 zoom . Which I did not need either, a 50mm and a 75 was enuff as it turned out later.
There is nothing better than practical expereince, never listen to folks who havemn't really done it. No matter what it could be.
Bertram
Last edited by a moderator: