Rolleimagic maintenance

CollinB

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2007
Messages
666
Location
Ohio, USA
Format
Medium Format
Yesterday I picked up a RolleiMagic @ a modest price (I think it's the R-M II, but the badge is missing)
but it seems that the meter is out. Since these were early 60s, I suspect it's one of those dang CDS
cells that Goossen put in. Anyone know of a replacement parts source?
 

TheFlyingCamera

Membership Council
Advertiser
Joined
May 24, 2005
Messages
11,546
Location
Washington DC
Format
Multi Format
Go take a look at some of the Rollei fan websites- IIRC Rolleimagics of any stripe are highly discouraged. I don't know if they are useable without a working meter, and I'm pretty sure the meters in any variety are un-repairable if broken. If you can return it for a refund, that would be my first advice. Look around for a decent 2.8 C, D or E. Deals can be found with a bit of patience - I got my 2.8E off Ebay for right around $500. Meter is toast, but that's to be expected. Everything else is in good working order if not cosmetically.
 

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,544
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
Not a CDS cell. I'd use it without the meter.
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2003
Messages
4,924
Location
San Francisco
Format
Multi Format
The Edsel of the Rollei line. When I only had one Rolleiflex and dreamed of trying others I almost bought one but as mentioned most recommend just staying away.
 

jochen

Member
Joined
May 13, 2008
Messages
350
Location
Germany
Format
35mm
Hello,
the Rolleimagics were cheaper models for the amateur who wanted an automatic exposure camera. The lightmeter is a selenium cell which cannot be repaired or exchanged if dead since it is no longer available as a spare part. The Rolleimagics are said to be rather unreliable and today many are dead. In contrast to all other Rollei TLR's they have a simplified front lens focussing Tessar because of the integration of the automatic mechanism. If you want to take pictures with the camera, every other post-war Rolleiflex or -cord (with coated lens) is the better choice.
 
OP
OP

CollinB

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2007
Messages
666
Location
Ohio, USA
Format
Medium Format
Well, since I already have it, perhaps some other use for it is in order.
 

TheFlyingCamera

Membership Council
Advertiser
Joined
May 24, 2005
Messages
11,546
Location
Washington DC
Format
Multi Format
The Edsel of the Rollei line. When I only had one Rolleiflex and dreamed of trying others I almost bought one but as mentioned most recommend just staying away.

I think calling it the Edsel of Rolleis is an insult to Edsels. At heart, they were good cars, just rushed into production and so they had QC problems right off the factory line, particularly in the paint department. Once rebuilt, they are solid, reliable vehicles. The Rolleimagic, once dead, stays dead. Plus they're even uglier than an Edsel. Sixty years on, the horse collar grill kinda grows on you. I don't think anyone will ever love the snout they put on the Rolleimagic.
 

Nick Merritt

Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2007
Messages
433
Location
Hartford, Co
Format
Multi Format
There are sources for selenium meter cells. Before junking the camera (and I do think the meter must be working for the camera to work, at least the Rolleimagic I), contact Quality Light Metric (I think that's the name) in LA.
 
OP
OP

CollinB

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2007
Messages
666
Location
Ohio, USA
Format
Medium Format
Nick,
Right now the shutter fires at one speed and then with a delay after pressing the release. Not right.
Thanks. I'll see what the cost would be.
Otherwise I might be best off to sell it and try to break even.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…