Pt/Pd and Lana Aquarelle paper

A Forest

A
A Forest

  • 8
  • 4
  • 168
Say it with flowers

A
Say it with flowers

  • 3
  • 1
  • 142
IMG_0701.jpeg

A
IMG_0701.jpeg

  • 3
  • 2
  • 107
The letter P.

A
The letter P.

  • 3
  • 1
  • 112

Forum statistics

Threads
186,627
Messages
2,599,369
Members
96,585
Latest member
jc123
Recent bookmarks
1

Dan Dozer

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 10, 2004
Messages
393
Format
Large Format
ARGH ! ! ! ! ! This has been a very frustrating afternoon. I wanted to try some new paper types for Pt/Pd printing so I got a few sheets of Lana Aquarelle from B&S. Started my printing session making a couple of prints on Bergger COT 320 and everything went fine.

Then I tried making some test exposures on Lana Aquarelle with a 4 x 5 step wedge and everything started going wrong. First images came out super grainy and no where near getting close blacks to where they should be (15 minute exposure). Came in and checked on the forum about what other people's "problems" have been and found everything requiring pre-soaking in Oxalic Acid, to double coating, to super humidifying. Grain problems seem to be a trend among most printers. Tried double coating and it came out darker - sort of close to what I wanted, but instead of super grainy, it's only really grainy. Looks somewhat like a Lith print. Now if that was the affect I was looking for, I would be extatic, but it wasn't and I'm not. To top it off, after the double coating process, the print wouldn't clear completely and it's left with yellow edges.

B&S describes this paper on their website as one that is one of their favorite papers for Pt/Pd and good for beginners and experienced printers. I don't see this at all in my limited experience today.

Not sure what I'll do with the paper I have left. I don't want to waste more Pt/Pd chemicals on it and not get consistant results, and all the "pre-treating" that it appears is needed is more trouble than I want to go through.

Am I alone with all these problems or are others having the same experiences as I am?
 

Colin Graham

Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2004
Messages
1,264
Format
Plastic Cameras
I never could get Lana to work for kallitypes either, even acid treatment did not help.

(sorry about first reply, which was about Arches Aquarelle)
 

Don12x20

Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Messages
248
Location
Pacific North
Format
Multi Format
Although I prefer Platine (or the original Platinotype), I have used Lana Aquarelle for several projects. I've never had to do any pretreatment with Na2 Pd/Pt. The standard step tablet tests (as well as in use printing ) show that the exposure is 2x what Platine/Platinotype/others require. The blacks aren't quite as deep as with Platine or Platinotype or Cot320 or Fabriano Aristico or original Weston Diploma, but they're not bad. If you want deep blacks you might consider using something other than L.A.

The paper tests slightly acidic with the usual pH test (pen from Light Impressions) so an oxallic acid pretreat won't do a thing.

Maybe they've changed the paper since I last purchased a stock in summer 2008, but I've had absolutely no problems with this paper. YMMV.

Good luck
 

PVia

Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2006
Messages
1,058
Location
Pasadena, CA
Format
Multi Format
Hi Dan...

We met at the Riverside show. It's probably just the paper or the need for acidification. I also find that in really dry weather like we've been having lately that grain can start appearing, which is one of the reasons printers like Stan Klimek, who lives in Santa Fe, recommends humidifying before coating and pre-exposure as well. If COT 320 gives you everything you need without all the fuss, why go elsewhere, right?

I use Fabriano Artistico EW, but I do acidify in oxalic acid, as well as a post-coat pre-exposure humidification over a pot of steaming water for a short time. I also put a sheet of transparent mylar over the neg sandwich before I put the contact frame hinged-back on, to trap the moisture in the paper (another Klimek tip).

Looking forward to seeing new work from you...
 
OP
OP

Dan Dozer

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 10, 2004
Messages
393
Format
Large Format
Don - I had seen your responses on other photographer's questions but you haven't seemed to have the problems like me. It seems like the grain issue is the most frustrating right now. I'm not sure why you have had good results and mine are not. I'll have to check into the acid pre-treatment step and humidification (although I did humidify it before coating, but not much before exposure). I'm guessing that the humidity is probably the probably the primary cause.

Phil - Thanks for the tip on the mylar - I hadn't heard that one before so I'll think I'll try it. Maybe I'll just stay with Bergger - it has proven to be pretty consistant for me. As you said, the humidigy can be pretty low out here in the desert - it was actually only 15% today. By the way, if Per has another Josua Tree get together this winter, maybe you can make it and I'll get to see some of your work.

Thanks Guys
 

Don12x20

Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Messages
248
Location
Pacific North
Format
Multi Format
Dan
I'm guessing humidity -- my darkroom up here in the humid northwest sits at 60% plus/minus 5% most of the year.

Try getting a cold humidifier -- you'll see them cheaply available at your local drug store. Uses ultrasonic emitter to blast the water into vapor which you can see leaving the unit. You can use this to raise your darkroom to more humid conditions, or do as Dick Arentz does...build a humidification unit out of white plastic pipe and plastic = both available at the hardware store. Put a pan of water underneath and "soak(in the chamber not in the water tray)" the paper for 20 minutes or so ...until coating and exposure. The idea of a plastic sandwich, which is often used for Ziatypes, is a good one.

One thing about the nuarc printers -- I don't use plastic sandwiches, and use a large vacuum table(I use one that was substantially larger than the usual 26K version that many use. That vacuum table tends to pull all the moisture out of the coating (I'll pull a vacuum on carbon tissue to ensure its dry before I use a negative next to it). Since I don't have problems with the exposure of the resulting dried paper at exposure, I am thinking that you have a coating problem -- the paper is too dry at coating which sucks the liquid deeper into the fibers. Try this: hold the paper in front of the vapor coming out of the cold humidifier for a few minutes - moving it around. It won't get wet but it will get humid (you can feel it). I did this two summers ago at Dick Arentz's Masters class in extremely dry and hot conditions in Montana (formulary). It may help.

let us know what you find out (experiments with humidification,etc)
 
OP
OP

Dan Dozer

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 10, 2004
Messages
393
Format
Large Format
Hi Don,

Thanks for the advice. I'll look into the humidity issues and see what I can work out.

Can't make it to the Galli/Volquartz workshop. My "real" job is taking me out of town each of the next three weeks. I'm actually going to be in Eastern Washington (Richland) in two weeks. I'm guessing that if you have 60% humidity, you're either on the coast or in the Seattle area.

Dan
 

PVia

Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2006
Messages
1,058
Location
Pasadena, CA
Format
Multi Format
Don - No I won't be there, unfortunately. I just saw Per, as I live in the same town and he is always an inspiration to be around.

Dan - It's always tough to print when the RH is that low. I had the same conditions in Pasadena a few weeks ago and was printing a small series. There was a bit of grain in my shadow tones that I had not experienced before. I ended up reprinting two of the prints when conditions were better. They weren't terrible or anything, just not exactly what I usually look for.

Paul
 

Loris Medici

Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2005
Messages
1,154
Location
Istanbul, Tu
Format
Multi Format
An extra tip for excessively dry weather

- Ultrasonic humidifier: Pre-coating and/or pre-exposure and/or post-exposure, works nice, it's a very handy tool.
- Impermeable protective sheet between paper and felt: Works nice, essential for long exposures and/or uniform print color. (If not used corners and center of image may show different hue; warmer in corners, colder in the center, or, you may notice a hue change along the hinge on the back...)

Those above are nice suggestions. I'd like to add this one:
- When printing in very dry climate, try adding glycerin to your coating solutions; glycerin is chemically inert regarding the reactions which take place during exposure/development (plus, will wash away later) and "it's a very good humectant". It will keep necessary amnt. of moisture in the paper. 2-4 drops per ml of coating solution is usually enough -> try other amnts. to find what's right for you.

Regards,
Loris.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Don12x20

Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Messages
248
Location
Pacific North
Format
Multi Format
Dan, Paul
Sorry you won't be there - I have a series of 8x10 images of a very dark roundhouse with steam engines -- all on different papers so you can compare (the detail in the blacks is the important part for this discussion...I keep seveal PDN created negatives for comparision printing when I try a new paper). Also the 4x5 sized step tablets images. I would have brought them for you to take a look at.

I'm in the Portland area -- up in the hills nearby. Forested environment. Only gets real dry late in the summer, otherwise its nice and humid. A great place for alt image printing.

Don
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Don12x20

Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Messages
248
Location
Pacific North
Format
Multi Format
Don - No I won't be there, unfortunately. I just saw Per, as I live in the same town and he is always an inspiration to be around.

Dan - It's always tough to print when the RH is that low. I had the same conditions in Pasadena a few weeks ago and was printing a small series. There was a bit of grain in my shadow tones that I had not experienced before. I ended up reprinting two of the prints when conditions were better. They weren't terrible or anything, just not exactly what I usually look for.

Paul

Paul
Run one of the cold humifiers in your darkroom for a period before printing.
And get a humidity meter - I got a simple dial verstion from Light Impressions long ago; not sure if they still have them but you can find them locally as well.
Don
 

PVia

Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2006
Messages
1,058
Location
Pasadena, CA
Format
Multi Format
I plan on getting an ultrasonic unit soon...it'll be handy for the house as well.
 

Loris Medici

Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2005
Messages
1,154
Location
Istanbul, Tu
Format
Multi Format
Paul, definitely try the glycerin method too, it can prove to be a nice diversity. (Especially for palladium; possibilities include better speed, higher dmax and/or colder print colors, plus more open shadows due slightly stronger printout. It will decrease emulsion speed with platinum btw...)
 

nick mulder

Member
Joined
May 15, 2005
Messages
1,212
Format
8x10 Format
15 minute exposure !?

hmmmm, I'm getting nice blacks in around a minute in NA2, A/B and Zia - might be a bit off topic as I'm not using Aquarelle (COT320, Platine, Kid Finish) - but 15 mins ... thats a lot tea drinking
 

colrehogan

Member
Joined
May 11, 2004
Messages
2,011
Location
St. Louis, M
Format
Large Format Pan
I didn't try this paper at the workshop I just attended, but one of the others did. He had the same clearing problems as you had mentioned. They tried a stronger concentration of clearing bath which helped this particular paper.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom