My recommendation is you try modifying an existing print digitally to match your preference.
I'm not sure what this might be. Is it an RA-4 paper? Product name?low-contrast Portrait paper
My recommendation is you try modifying an existing print digitally to match your preference.
This is a absurd advice in an analog forum.
People need to read all of Rudeofus' suggestion.I was thinking the same thing. He asks for a plane flight from London to Liverpool, and someone tells him to fly to Singapore, and catch a flight there to Liverpool.
hi MichaelI'm venturing back into the darkroom for the first time in a decade and I am feeling a little under prepared.
I primarily shoot colour now (120 Portra) but have more experience within a B&W darkroom, it also seems the web is awash with information and technique related to B&W but incredibly little on the colour side of things. So excuse my ignorance.
I'm attempting to print the project I have been working on for the last three+ years, so I have a lot to get through. With my first session coming up, I want to get a good solid idea of the look and feel of my prints. While being able to replicate the technique and create a uniform look.
By no means is this set in stone, but I wanted to test out a few ideas before getting stuck into the many images to print.
So...
I have an idea of creating a milky/creamy feel, ever so slightly washed out blacks and not overly strong highlights, without creating an underexposed print.
I'm guessing that using a small preflash will help me achieve this look, though I'm not certain.
Does anyone have experience with this technique to create a feel or look to the their prints, rather than using it just to bring back lost highlight details?
Hopefully I'm not completely off, but if so any other ideas would be greatly appreciated.
(also I wish I had some references to hand, but I can't think of nor find one at the time of writing.)
Thanks,
Michael
http://michaelmills.co.uk
That won't help you. Ctein did those kind of images using the Pan Matrix version of dye transfer printing, an obsolete process with a wide range of process controls including the adjustment of contrast via dye pH in relation to the paper mordant. Since the special pan film is no longer made, he's sold off much of the accompanying supplies. I personally bought some of his remaining Eastman dyes, but for sake of the more common version of dye transfer printing from chromes rather than color negs. Otherwise, it's more effective to pre-flash film rather than paper, or locate frozen stocks of old idiosyncratic films of low contrast, that is, if we're going to stay the course of analog discussion per se.
You can also preflash, it has the same effect than in B&W but you shoud do it with some orange mask of the film you are printing in the negative holder to avoid altering the color balance.
Hi apollo. From conversations with him in person, I don't think he ever actually tried masking for RA4 printing except in a token sense, but was making largely hypothetical remarks. He was primarily a dye transfer printer, so did understand masking in general; but the two approaches are quite different in details. I'm one of the few printers with serious hands-on experience doing masking for RA4. A somewhat older book like that would have to be rethought anyway because you'd have to dial in everything for the exact color neg as well as masking films involved, which have changed. The Post Exposure book is still a good resource to have around. Masking color negs is a lot like power steering : just a little has a significant effect. That's because they already have a built-in orange mask.
So to follow on from my original question...the steps are the same as B&W? Would I need to compensate for added exposure during the preflash?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?