Not from the little green men! It took me a long time to find an old brass lens that wasn't tack sharp but didn't have swirly corners or a sharp center fading to softness at the edges. Rather, one that had the overall look of a pinhole but at f/11. The lens is unmarked, made for waterhouse stops which I don't have and probably wouldn't use. It is about 180mm and covers 4x5. I use it on a Speed Graphic. This is the first time I've tried to load a photo here so please cut me some slack. Oh, and this is just a work 8x10 scanned at 100dpi so if someone has a better way, I'd like to hear about it.
(there was a url link here which no longer exists)
and
(there was a url link here which no longer exists)
I've since printed Becky's portrait on Ilford WT and it worked great! The scanner I used was never meant for negatives and so the scan is muddier than the final print was. Don't have the print to scan. Sorry.
Perhaps, but the examples you've given don't have the classic pictorial look I was after. They grow increasingly softer away from the center, which I would class as a portrait lens effect, and the OOF is not particularly smooth in my thinking. But, I'm sure the effort was fun and that is half of it!
After seeing the book "Pictorialism in California", I finally had a chance to try the lens out on a classic pictorialist subject: San Juan Capistrano. These were on FP4+ with a green filter at 1/30 second in my Speed Graphic. The lens, the unmarked brassie 190mm f/11, was, of course, wide open.
Cool, those definitely have the classic pictorial look. I see some texture going on aside form the effects of the lens--are you using paper negs or some other techniques to get the look you want?
I suppose you are seeing the surface of the paper. Otherwise, straight prints from the 4x5 negs using a 135mm Componon-S on the FOMA warmtone paper toned in thiocarbamide.
a meniscus lens might give a similar effect.
often they were "optimized" for a certain distance
away from the camera, and if the subject is beyond
the sweet spot, it is kind of like what you have uploaded
(but obviously a bit different ) ...
Thanks, John. This appears to be a Rapid Rectilinear by construction, but a slow one at f/11. Compared to all my other RR's, it definitely has different characteristics. I really don't notice these effects on the GG. I had 1 hour and 6 sheets of film at Capistrano so it was kind of a mad rush. I'm on my way to the darkroom now to print the 3 others (I blew the first one.)
i have a lens harvested off a folder .. it had an aperture that
was a funnel shaped convex thingy, that screwed in the front of the lens.
it increased the fstop from about f4 or 5 to f11 or 16 .. and gave a sweet smooth
look like yours. it looks like you made a great find!
you might also try using it as your enlarging lens too
i've printed a few thing with my meniscus and it gives a nice smooth look as well ..
outwest what you see is shot at f-32 , not ab le to get my F-8 shots at the moment since I am packing for a move
at F-8 its about as soft as it gets and still have some detail , all I can say is have fun with soft lenses :