Reinhold
Advertiser
Yesterday, I developed 27 sheets of 8 x 20 inch HP5+ in PC-TEA, using the replenisher suggested by Pat Gainer in this post... (there was a url link here which no longer exists)
It worked great. Here are the details:
The developer was Sandy Kings variant of PC-TEA, which added an additional 0.2g of KBr to keep fog to a minimum. I developed by inspection in homemade trays, designed to hold 3 liters of chemistry. I found that I needed a dilution of 25 ml of PC-TEA per liter of water (1+40) to keep the developing times down to about 9 minutes. I replenished after each film, and was able to process up to 10 sheets in 3 liters (with 10 ml of replenisher added after each film).
Pat suggested a replenisher consisting of only Ascorbic acid and TEA to keep the ascorbate level up, and maintain the Ph. My first batch was 100 ml of TEA, (heated to 100C,) and 9.0 g of ascorbic acid. It worked nicely, but the viscosity made measuring out 10 ml and blending it into the tray of developer each time a fussy and time consuming task. I needed a faster way...
For my next batch, I dissolved the 9 g of AA into 100 ml of water, then added 100 ml of TEA (at room temperature, no heating needed), which gave me an easily measured, easily blended 50% diluted replenisher. Naturally, I now added 20 ml of the diluted replenisher after each film. Since theres no Phenidone in the mix, theres need to worry about longevity, either.
Developer activity, contrast, and tonality was consistent over the 10 film/replenishment period. I was processing a wide variety of subjects under a wide variety of lighting conditions, and developing times varied quite a bit according to subject and lighting. Wherever I had subjects of similar contrast and lighting, the developing times held constant, despite being replenished. Where contrast and lighting varied severely, developing by inspection saved the day. Except for the time I forgot to stop down, I got 26 beautiful keepers.
As Ole has noted in another post, inspecting the emulsion may be the better way, depending on how a developer works. With PC-TEA, I inspected the emulsion, and looked for shadow detail, rather than inspected the base side and looked for highlight detail. Been doing it that way for nigh onto 40 years.
This was not a series of sensitometric experiments, Ill leave that up to the technicians among us, but this project came to a great conclusion, with the help of a great guy Id like to meet someday...
Lets hear it for Pat Gainer.
Hip, Hip, Hooray......
It worked great. Here are the details:
The developer was Sandy Kings variant of PC-TEA, which added an additional 0.2g of KBr to keep fog to a minimum. I developed by inspection in homemade trays, designed to hold 3 liters of chemistry. I found that I needed a dilution of 25 ml of PC-TEA per liter of water (1+40) to keep the developing times down to about 9 minutes. I replenished after each film, and was able to process up to 10 sheets in 3 liters (with 10 ml of replenisher added after each film).
Pat suggested a replenisher consisting of only Ascorbic acid and TEA to keep the ascorbate level up, and maintain the Ph. My first batch was 100 ml of TEA, (heated to 100C,) and 9.0 g of ascorbic acid. It worked nicely, but the viscosity made measuring out 10 ml and blending it into the tray of developer each time a fussy and time consuming task. I needed a faster way...
For my next batch, I dissolved the 9 g of AA into 100 ml of water, then added 100 ml of TEA (at room temperature, no heating needed), which gave me an easily measured, easily blended 50% diluted replenisher. Naturally, I now added 20 ml of the diluted replenisher after each film. Since theres no Phenidone in the mix, theres need to worry about longevity, either.
Developer activity, contrast, and tonality was consistent over the 10 film/replenishment period. I was processing a wide variety of subjects under a wide variety of lighting conditions, and developing times varied quite a bit according to subject and lighting. Wherever I had subjects of similar contrast and lighting, the developing times held constant, despite being replenished. Where contrast and lighting varied severely, developing by inspection saved the day. Except for the time I forgot to stop down, I got 26 beautiful keepers.
As Ole has noted in another post, inspecting the emulsion may be the better way, depending on how a developer works. With PC-TEA, I inspected the emulsion, and looked for shadow detail, rather than inspected the base side and looked for highlight detail. Been doing it that way for nigh onto 40 years.
This was not a series of sensitometric experiments, Ill leave that up to the technicians among us, but this project came to a great conclusion, with the help of a great guy Id like to meet someday...
Lets hear it for Pat Gainer.
Hip, Hip, Hooray......