Olympus XA2 versus Stylus Zoom 105 ?

Papilio glaucus

D
Papilio glaucus

  • 0
  • 0
  • 7
The Bee keeper

A
The Bee keeper

  • 1
  • 4
  • 138
120 Phoenix Red?

A
120 Phoenix Red?

  • 7
  • 3
  • 142
Chloe

A
Chloe

  • 1
  • 3
  • 131
Fence line

A
Fence line

  • 10
  • 3
  • 172

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,175
Messages
2,770,646
Members
99,573
Latest member
IconicTyphoon
Recent bookmarks
0

mcgrattan

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2005
Messages
505
Location
Oxford, Engl
Format
Medium Format
Hi all,

I have a little Olympus XA2 which is my usual pocket camera which I always have with me, even when my larger cameras are at home.

Recently I had a chance to pick up a used Stylus Zoom 105 [actually a Mju zoom since I am in the UK] for around £10 GBP.

What I wanted to know is whether I'm likely to see an improvement over the XA2 in terms of image quality?

The Mju has the zoom lens which might not be as nice as the fixed focal length in the XA2 (I don't know) but the added autofocus and the more sophisticated metering might make more of a difference..

First, does £10 sound a reasonable price for one in well used but perfect working order... and will I see any improvement over the XA2?

How good are the Mju/Style zoom lenses?

[I may just buy it anyway in order to get the extra focal lengths]

Thanks in advance,

Matt
 

John Koehrer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 3, 2004
Messages
8,275
Location
Aurora, Il
Format
Multi Format
mcgrattan,
I doubt you'll see any difference in 4X6 prints. The XA2 has a definite speed advantage with max aperture. 2.8 or3.5 vs 8 and smaler with the zoom your max aperture decreases so you may need to be in full sun to take advantage of the zoom.
 

skahde

Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2004
Messages
492
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
When you are used to going outdoors with an XA2 you will probably like an XA without the "2" as soon as you try one. As an alternative I recommend the mju II with its fast 2,8/35mm (for the second time within 8 hrs, actually). Having used both, the latter is even sharper and more flare-resistant than the lens in the XA.
 

benjiboy

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 18, 2005
Messages
11,954
Location
U.K.
Format
35mm
skahde said:
When you are used to going outdoors with an XA2 you will probably like an XA without the "2" as soon as you try one. As an alternative I recommend the mju II with its fast 2,8/35mm (for the second time within 8 hrs, ac
tually). Having used both, the latter is even sharper and more flare-resistant

I would try to find a used X. A. they had the advantage of a coupled rangefinder , which is a big advantage when shooting in low light at large appatures
 

johnfalky

Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2005
Messages
9
Format
35mm
For entertainment: I recently purchased a Minolta Autofocus "V" (complete with tinny little computer voice that warns you of the obvious). While tinkering with it in a dimly lit room I noticed that it has an extensive range of shutter speeds down to what appears to be several seconds. Anybody ever heard of this camera ??(it does not appear to be common) Got it complete in the original wrapper, instruction manual and Minolta Box...$5.00. Couldn't pass it up. The first roll of film is being developed. I was looking to buy an XA but it this unit works well, I will probably pass on the Olympus.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom