MPP Microflex

Roses

A
Roses

  • 2
  • 0
  • 72
Rebel

A
Rebel

  • 4
  • 2
  • 92
Watch That First Step

A
Watch That First Step

  • 1
  • 0
  • 65
Barn Curves

A
Barn Curves

  • 2
  • 1
  • 59
Columbus Architectural Detail

A
Columbus Architectural Detail

  • 4
  • 2
  • 64

Forum statistics

Threads
197,489
Messages
2,759,846
Members
99,515
Latest member
falc
Recent bookmarks
0

and36y

Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2003
Messages
32
Location
near London
Format
Medium Format
Are there any Microflex users out there?.. If so what are they like, what is the picture quality compared with an equivelent aged TLR (rollei, Minolta). I am toying with trying to hunt one down, Just wondered whether I would be disappointed

Thanks


Andy
 

Helen B

Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2004
Messages
1,590
Location
Hell's Kitch
Format
Multi Format
I used a Microflex for a while in the early eighties until it became unreliable. The lens was OK – neither unusably bad nor stunningly good – and I was very happy with it. The problems were with the film transport. I did give it some fairly heavy use though.

Best,
Helen
 

stark raving

Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2005
Messages
126
Location
Lumberton, N
Format
35mm
Andy-

Just wondering. Do you mean Microflex or Microcord? I'd heard MPP only produced a few hundred of the Microflexes, good luck finding one.

Jonathan
 
OP
OP

and36y

Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2003
Messages
32
Location
near London
Format
Medium Format
I mean microflex. I have a microcord, that give lovely crisp images (the viewing screen is a bit dim though). The flex had a different lens and winding mech. I have just seen one go today in ebay for £89, they appear quite frequently..


Cheers

Andy
 
Joined
Dec 12, 2004
Messages
2,361
Location
East Kent, U
Format
Medium Format
In good condition, the lenses deliver reasonable results, but the shutters are fragile. For about the same money, I'd take a Rolleicord every time.
 

Brac

Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2004
Messages
632
Location
UK
Format
35mm
The Microcord which appeared in more than one version is the earlier camera and has a Ross taking lens. The camera was replaced by the Microflex which had a taking lens by Taylor Taylor Hobson. This was reputed to be slightly better than the Ross. By the time the Microflex came on the market restrictions on German camera imports to the UK had been eased and so it had to compete against the Rolleiflex which for various reasons it was not successfully able to do. As a result there are less of this model around than the Microcord but they are still reasonably common. As far as shutters are concerned, I think the earliest Microcord used an uncommon make of shutter (was it called an Epsilon - I'm not sure) but later the Prontor was used so that shouldn't be a problem. I think the Microflex's weakest point is its lever wind which I understand can give problems. Mine is OK but then I've not used it much.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom