LITH printing, ILFORD MGWT and Adox Variotone Premium

Brentwood Kebab!

A
Brentwood Kebab!

  • 0
  • 0
  • 37
Summer Lady

A
Summer Lady

  • 0
  • 0
  • 43
DINO Acting Up !

A
DINO Acting Up !

  • 0
  • 0
  • 28
What Have They Seen?

A
What Have They Seen?

  • 0
  • 0
  • 40
Lady With Attitude !

A
Lady With Attitude !

  • 0
  • 0
  • 40

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,763
Messages
2,780,560
Members
99,700
Latest member
Harryyang
Recent bookmarks
0

Tom Kershaw

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 5, 2004
Messages
4,974
Location
Norfolk, United Kingdom
Format
Multi Format
In my experience MGWT and the Adox paper give similar results processed in standard developer solutions. However, the Variotone Premium paper is said not to lith whereas in the past I've been able to achieve effective results lith processing MGWT. I plan to make a comparison within the next week or so; but any previous experience?

My main paper for lith printing has been Foma 532 II Nature but previous results with MGWT might suit some negatives I'd like to print; and the attraction of the Adox is the white base which may be the same emulsion as MGWT...

Tom
 

Bob Carnie

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 18, 2004
Messages
7,735
Location
toronto
Format
Med. Format RF
Tom

My favorite paper for lith is Ilford Warmtone, I have no experience with the Adox paper.
Are you pulling the Ilford the moment the blacks just start to emerge or when you thing the print is finished.
My experience with Ilford WT is that there is an amazing explosion of contrast in the fix which will fool most workers if they do not premature pull. **excuse any sick mind references **
I would be interested in side by side views posted of both papers of the same image, untoned.


Bob
 
OP
OP

Tom Kershaw

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 5, 2004
Messages
4,974
Location
Norfolk, United Kingdom
Format
Multi Format
Bob,

Thanks for replying. I've not got to the tests yet for one reason or another but I'll try and make some valid comparisons when I do; hopefully within the next few days. Having not lith printed since last year, it might take me a while to produce some good results. The point about comparing the two papers is that they give very similar results when used conventionally, but the Adox paper has been referenced as not being suitable for lith printing. Developer will probably be Fotospeed LD20.

Tom
 

tomalophicon

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2010
Messages
1,568
Location
Canberra, AC
Format
Sub 35mm
Bob, I've found Foma paper to be similar in it's explosion of blacks. It was very frustrating at first. I found it considerably worse with more developer dilution, which is somewhat surprising to me.

Are you able to scan your results Tom? I've never used Ilford Warmtone but would be keen to see some examples.
 

Mark Fisher

Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2003
Messages
1,691
Location
Chicago
Format
Medium Format
I find Ilford to be a much more subtle lith effect than most "lithable" papers......absolutely perfect for the right image. I tried Adox and couldn't get anything I was happy with.
 
Joined
Jan 21, 2003
Messages
15,708
Location
Switzerland
Format
Multi Format
Ilford MGWT is my preferred lith paper. The main reason is that it's so flexible and malleable. I find I can make good prints from both thin negatives needing more contrast, and really high contrast negatives needing less contrast in the print. Lovely grain, tones wonderfully - subtly if you so wish - in selenium and sulfide toners.

After I use up all my other papers for lith, this is what will remain as my standard supply.

- Thomas
 

Bob Carnie

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 18, 2004
Messages
7,735
Location
toronto
Format
Med. Format RF
Thanks to Guillume, I have tried quite a few, slavic, foto, and others but for my purposes and tastes I keep coming back to Ilford MGWT as well.

I buy this paper in 50 inch rolls as well as cut sheet , and the fact that I can comfortably make murals in Lith is really consistant within my workflow.
I just have to say the product is repeatable, fresh, consistant and somewhat readily available .

Thomas is right, with the addition of post toning a huge variety of tones are available.
The fact the print without toning can look green or yellow is already a bonus.
Making it look warm is easy with toning and some of my clients love the untoned look.
The use of flash will help with the grain if you want to lose some it. I can not imagine why you would as Flotsam said, it is supposed to be there.
Ilford MGWT is my preferred lith paper. The main reason is that it's so flexible and malleable. I find I can make good prints from both thin negatives needing more contrast, and really high contrast negatives needing less contrast in the print. Lovely grain, tones wonderfully - subtly if you so wish - in selenium and sulfide toners.

After I use up all my other papers for lith, this is what will remain as my standard supply.

- Thomas
 
OP
OP

Tom Kershaw

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 5, 2004
Messages
4,974
Location
Norfolk, United Kingdom
Format
Multi Format
Prints are in the wash at the moment. I can give a strong recommendation against using Adox Premium Variotone paper for lith printing, after 10 minutes the results were dreary, stained, uneven etc. I suspect the emulsion is substantially different from MGWT, even though both are made by Harman and can give similar results in other circumstances. Adox MCC 110 lith printed somewhat but not with the ease of the Foma paper or ILFORD MGWT. Scans may follow.

Tom
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom