Lens separation/re-cement question

Discussion in 'Enlarging' started by Arvee, Feb 28, 2009.

  1. Arvee

    Arvee Member
    Ads Enabled

    Messages:
    809
    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2006
    Location:
    The Wild West
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I have a six element Beseler Color Pro 90mm f4.5 enlarging lens that was suffering from severe lens separation problems.

    I took it apart and put the doublet in the oven at 325 deg. and separated the rear cell elements. Using acetone, I removed all the balsam and, not having any UV cement on hand, re-assembled the doublet in its metal cell.

    I have to note here that the cemented junction is composed of two flat surfaces, not concave-convex, which surprised me.

    The two flat surfaces mate quite nicely and, playing around, put the assembled, but not cemented, lens in the enlarger and made beautiful prints.

    What is the downside to leaving as is and not cementing the doublet back together. I probably will order UV cement from Summers after I talk to them but I am curious about leaving the two flat surfaces alone for the time being. If the lens performs well without cement, why were the two flat surfaces cemented?

    The doublet has a slight concave on the inner element facing the aperture blades and the rear lens surface is convex, as are most lenses. Again, the joined surfaces are flat.

    Optical experts, what say ye?

    -F.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies. If you have a Photrio account, please log in (and select 'stay logged in') to prevent recurrence of this notice.