Lens for M3

[shicks5319]

I have recently purchased a Leica M3 with the hope of finding a small unobtrusive camera for candid and general street photos. This one is SN 854238 one of the last double stroke versions.

The camera is beautiful and a real pleasure to work with (although I am having to get used to the smaller negative size). The problem is the Summicron f2 50mm lens that came with the camera has a lot of scratching on the front element; so much so that obtaining a sharp image is compromised.

I am hoping you rangefinder folks could help steer me on what strategies I should pursue.

1. Are there reasonable alternatives for finding a replacement front element for an older lens such as this?

2. What make/model lens would you folks recommend should I replace the entire lens? I am hoping to stay within a budget of $500 - $750 per lens.


I really appreciate you taking the time to consider this question.

 

[fpjohn]

Hello:

May I ask if you are using a sunshade? An older Summicron in good shape has a tendency to flare. The other option is to have it CLA'd. See The Rangefinder Forum for references, and opinions, on polishing and recoating services.

Cosina Voightlander LTM lenses are great bargins and fine optics. See the Camerquest site.

yours
Frank.

 

[shicks5319]

M3 Lens

Hello:

May I ask if you are using a sunshade? An older Summicron in good shape has a tendency to flare. The other option is to have it CLA'd. See The Rangefinder Forum for references, and opinions, on polishing and recoating services.

Cosina Voightlander LTM lenses are great bargins and fine optics. See the Camerquest site.

yours
Frank.

Thanks for the reply, Frank.

I do NOT currently have a sunshade on this lens, and therefore have been careful with light direction. My problem is that the scratching on the front element is really visible when you open up the lens to f2 and look through it.

I will check out the Rangefinder Forum.


thanks.

 

[fpjohn]

Hello:

I have ugly lenses, visible coating marks, scratches, etc. that perform well.

Yours may be ok. Are you satisfied with prints from negs taken in open shade?

yours
Frank

 

[Alexz]

Even the current Summicron 50mm/2 can be had used but realy Minted at your highest limit of 750$. They usually go for 750-820$ in tha condition, but some patience will pay off finding it for about 750$.
Here on APUG I saw very rarely Leica stuff being sold, however on RFF (ranegfinderforum.com) often godo quality RF stuff is selling, and the 50mm'Cron isn't that rarity there for quite reasonable pricing.
I picked my Summicron 50mm/2 (current version) there for 775$ which I consider very reasonable given its nealry Like New condition.
Photo.net Leica board may also have thing to offer, but prices there are usually somewhat higher..

 

[Jim Jones]

An often overlooked 50mm for the Leica is the Elmar f/2.8. I believe it outperforms the Summicron at comparable apertures, and is quite compact when collapsed. Unfortunately, enough people do appreciate this little gem to keep the price up.

 

[elekm]

With some lenses, the elements are part of matched sets, so simply swapping out the front element will cause more problems than it corrects, because the lens will no longer focus at indicated distances. However, I don't know if this is the case with the Summicron. You might want to contact Leica.

You could try to re-polish the front element. In theory, it slightly alters the shape of the element, but it might be your best best.

Your other option is to simply replace the lens.

My own experience with cleaning marks is that they tend to lower the contrast -- often noticeably -- in the center of the image. If the cleaning marks are really bad, they can degrade sharpness, which seems to be the case with your lens.

ADDED: I also agree that the Cosina Voigtlander lenses are incredible bargains, if cost is a concern.

 

[Richard Wasserman]

You also might talk to John Van Stelton at Focal Point- http://www.focalpointlens.com/fp_intro.html. If the scratches aren't too deep he can polish and coat the front element and clean the lens. It would cost less than what you are thinking of spending and could solve the problems you're having. He did a Dual Range Summicron for me and it's now a jewel.

Richard Wasserman

 

[shicks5319]

Reply to Frank

Hello:

I have ugly lenses, visible coating marks, scratches, etc. that perform well.

Yours may be ok. Are you satisfied with prints from negs taken in open shade?

yours
Frank

I am NOT happy with the lens performance as yet. It has a "soft" look on the negatives which I have attributed to the scratched front element.

The scatches appear to be much deeper than what I would call cleaning marks.

 

[shicks5319]

Thanks for great comments.

I really appreciate the great comments from all. You have given me a lot to go on.

 

[willie_901]

In your price range the CV Nokton 50/1.5 with the LTM to M adapter would be a good choice. Take the money you save, add it to your budget for a second lens, and get the Zeiss ZM Biogon 35/3. This is a wonderful lens.

If you prefer the older M lens look, try http://www.kevincameras.com/ or KEH. These firms enjoy reasonable reputations.

 

[matti]

I have had some really really sharp pictures with my Jupiter 8 2/50 in a screw mount adaptor. It is a bit annoying that it lacks clicks for the aperture, though.

/matti

 

[mrtoml]

I would second having a look at the CV Nokton 50.

There is a group on flickr dedicated to this lens so you can get an idea of its look.

 

[mike_j]

For candid/street use it's hard to beat a slightly wider angle and the CV Color Skopar 35/2.5 is a cracking little lens. I use it as a standard on my M6

 

[Donald Boyd]

The Elmar 50 f/2.8 would be too slow for 400 film indoors. Even with an F2 lens you'll be shooting at 1/30 and 1/15 much of the time, unless you use faster film or push it, which kind of defeats the purpose of using a good lens.

 

[copake_ham]

As with SLR, so with RF, I am a Nikonian so take what I say with a large grain of salt.

Since in the RF world we Nikonians were "starved" for half a century - I am forever indebted to Mr. Kobayashi (sp) for using Cosina to revive the mid-20th Century RF world both generally, and specifically.

In your price range I think you are much better off with a new CV lens lens.

If you are willing to double your price range - then go for a ZM.

 

[elekm]

I think the prices of Kevin's Cameras -- at least on eBay -- on unreasonably high. You can find much better deals elsewhere -- such as here on the classifieds and on other boards as well.

 

[Donald Boyd]

In the USA Camera Quest is a good source for CV lenses such as the Nokton 50 / F1.5. The website is http://www.cameraquest.com. The owner is a good guy - honest, and goes the extra mile.

 

[shicks5319]

Action taken

Well, with all the great advice recieved from everybody (thanks to all), I have decided on a strategy:

John Van Stelton at Focal Point came up with, what sounds to me, a very reasonable quote for cleaning up and servicing my Summicron 50mm lens - $250 including the repolish and recoat.

So I have gone out a picked up a 90mm TELE-ELMARIT from KEH for just under $500. When it gets here, I send off the summicron to Focal Point.

If the repair works, and the Tele-elmarit lives up to expectations, I will end up with two lenses for just a little more than I started off planning for.

Once I have saved up some more pennies I'll look over the CV 35mm.

I'll post a note on how this all turns out.

 

[dachs]

M3 Replacement optic

Dear Colleague from Mexico

Look out for a modern collapsible 50mm F2.8 - get one in silver (brass) if possible to maintain your camera's period appeal.

It is the cheapest £eica lens at about GBP 600 ( ~ $ 1000 US) when new, and is of stunning quality and a joy to play with. Also very compact, unobtrusive, not prone to flare with built on hood, convenient.

I love mine!

b0b

 

[Guillaume Zuili]

The Elmar 50 f/2.8 would be too slow for 400 film indoors. Even with an F2 lens you'll be shooting at 1/30 and 1/15 much of the time, unless you use faster film or push it, which kind of defeats the purpose of using a good lens.

The purpose of rangefinder camera is to work in available light usually at very low speed and wide open. It is very common to shoot between the second up to 1/8 hand held. So many great photographs have been made exactly this way.
Having a Leica to use it on tripod defeats almost all his attributes and in that case it's better to use an slr or a large format camera...
The compact Elmar (when closed) on a M body fits easily in a pocket, f/2.8 is a very acceptable trade off. This is an excellent all around lens. Now if you really need these extra stops the summilux is amazing wide open... even at one second hand held.

 

[jon koss]

If you are in the market I have a couple of 50mm Leica Summitars that are really pretty. Each could be had for rather a bit less than $500 to $750!

Please PM if interested.

Thanks,
Jon

I have recently purchased a Leica M3 ... Are there reasonable alternatives for finding a replacement front element for an older lens such as this?

2. What make/model lens would you folks recommend should I replace the entire lens? I am hoping to stay within a budget of $500 - $750 per lens...]

 

[luvcameras]

My lens guide should help you, see
Dead Link Removed

Dan

 

[Steve Bellayr]

You can also use 35 instead of a 50 and would be easier to focus under the conditions that you describe. The cv lenses at cameraquest are within you budget.

 

[slipkid]

Softness can be the "Leica look"

Many of the Leica/Leitz lenses have what is often described as a "glow." Many photogs use older period lenses to get that look. My collapsible Summitar and 50/1.5 Summarit both produce results that are softer looking than those produced by my Summicrons. Out of the Summicrons, the pre-asph version (with the built-in hood) is more "technical" looking than my ~50 year old collapsible, fixed or dual-range Summicrons...

I also agree that the CV line is a great bargain for new lenses...Good luck!

AJ