Kodak Portra 160 NC or VC?

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
177,191
Messages
2,430,746
Members
94,146
Latest member
shawnmcc
Recent bookmarks
0

rogueish

Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2004
Messages
876
Location
3rd Rock
Shooter
Multi Format
Kodak Portra 160 NC or VC, what's the difference between these two 120 format films?

I'm also looking for a decent colour 120 format film for landscapes. Some shots will be broad wide open fields with rolling hills, some will be shady (open and dense) forests and others will be river/waterfall/rapids.
Which film do you use?
 
Joined
Dec 12, 2004
Messages
2,361
Location
East Kent, U
Shooter
Medium Format
According to Kodak, one gives Normal Color, the other gives Vivid Color! VC is meant for studio use, NC for outside (uncontrolled lighting, according to Kodak). I personally use 160 VC for landscapes and really like the color rendition (although I must admit I have only scanned my negs and not made chemical prints).

Regards,

David
 

bobfowler

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 18, 2003
Messages
1,441
Location
New Jersey,
Shooter
Multi Format
I like the NC for skin tones with electronic flash - specifically when using studio strobes. I must confess to using 400VC when shooting weddings. The extra color saturation helps pop the image when shooting available light in churches.

For landscape work, I'll stick with B&W! :smile:
 

panchromatic

Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2005
Messages
218
Location
Lansdale, PA
Shooter
Multi Format
I've heard people describe NC as (No Color) but I think its ignorant to say that, comparied to VC which has more color saturation. I personally like VC more than NC, but I shot the UC in the new packaging and I like it, though I found its only good in portraits, not a landscape film IMHO.
 

Sanjay Sen

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2005
Messages
1,246
Location
New York, NY
Shooter
Multi Format
I have used the NC (35mm only) and like the skin tones that it renders. I do not (usually) shoot indoors and do not use a flash. I have not tried VC but I found NC quite adequate for my landscapes as well.
 

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
19,830
Location
Honolulu, Ha
Shooter
Large Format
One is "normal color" and the other is "vulgar color." Actually, it's not that bad, but in flat light, you might want the bit of a boost you get from the VC. I lean toward neutrality. NC skin tones are great.
 

Tom Duffy

Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Messages
969
Location
New Jersey
I'd have to say "D", none of the above. The finest color neg film I've ever used is Kodak's Portra 400 UC. Low contrast, good saturation, excellent skintones and grain reputably equal to the 160 speed films. I now use this for all my color stuff except sheet sizes which aren't available.
Take care,
Tom
 

jd callow

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 31, 2003
Messages
8,447
Location
Milan
Shooter
Multi Format
For landscapes which I don't shoot I would go with 100uc (if I have a tripod) or 400uc, Reala would be my 3rd choice and NPC would be 4th. I don't like vc much, but I do think NC is a very fine film, but not the best for landscapes.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford Photo ADOX Freestyle Photographic Photo Warehouse Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab
Top Bottom