Kodak Gold 1600 - EXP/1992

A street portrait

A
A street portrait

  • 0
  • 0
  • 83
A street portrait

A
A street portrait

  • 1
  • 1
  • 74
img746.jpg

img746.jpg

  • 4
  • 0
  • 74
No Hall

No Hall

  • 1
  • 2
  • 73
Brentwood Kebab!

A
Brentwood Kebab!

  • 1
  • 1
  • 126

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,793
Messages
2,780,917
Members
99,705
Latest member
Hey_You
Recent bookmarks
0

ChristopherCoy

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 9, 2011
Messages
3,599
Location
On a boat.
Format
Multi Format
Here is the first roll of test film from the two bricks that I purchased from @summicron1

Under advice from The Darkroom lab, I shot the roll at ISO800. The first frame of every set is shot as metered TTL. The second frame is shot at ISO400 or +2 EV. They were developed as normal, again according to The Darkroom and developed by The Darkroom.

The whole roll is viewable on my Flickr account. https://www.flickr.com/photos/christophercoy/sets/72157714498027828

000107000010 by Christopher Coy, on Flickr

000107000011 by Christopher Coy, on Flickr
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 2, 2017
Messages
804
Location
Michigan, United States
Format
Multi Format
hst2021.jpg
hst2022.jpg
hst2023.jpeg
hst2024.jpg
hst2025.jpg
hst2026.jpg
 
Joined
Jul 2, 2017
Messages
804
Location
Michigan, United States
Format
Multi Format
Are these the same type of film? And if so, how did you shoot/develop them?
All from the same roll. the top one was shot at iso 200 (I assumed the film was 30 years expired), and going down I increased my exposure by one stop. I had the film developed normally by my camera store. the results of this test and a the few other rolls I tried showed that GENERALLY, if the standard rule for expired CN film is one stop per decade, high speed film only needs one additional stop. However... Ektar 1000 and Max 800 defied this rule and worked fine with the standard one stop per decade.
 
OP
OP
ChristopherCoy

ChristopherCoy

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 9, 2011
Messages
3,599
Location
On a boat.
Format
Multi Format
All from the same roll. the top one was shot at iso 200 (I assumed the film was 30 years expired), and going down I increased my exposure by one stop. I had the film developed normally by my camera store. the results of this test and a the few other rolls I tried showed that GENERALLY, if the standard rule for expired CN film is one stop per decade, high speed film only needs one additional stop. However... Ektar 1000 and Max 800 defied this rule and worked fine with the standard one stop per decade.

So this was Kodak Gold 1600?
 

summicron1

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 28, 2010
Messages
2,920
Location
Ogden, Utah
Format
Multi Format
that's fascinating. I salute you for having the patients to do that...you may get some good use out of that.

Yeah, with only 39 more rolls to deal with, you may need to pace yourself.

thanks

Charlie
 
Joined
Jul 2, 2017
Messages
804
Location
Michigan, United States
Format
Multi Format
Interesting. I really wasn't expecting much since no one knows how it was stored, but these came back rather interesting. I'm wondering if a ND filter would change things any. Have you tried one?

I've got 39 more rolls of this stuff so I want to optimize results.
Only ever used an ND filter with digital, even then I've hardly ever used one.
 
  • Donald Qualls
  • Donald Qualls
  • Deleted
  • Reason: reply to now deleted question
  • Donald Qualls
  • Donald Qualls
  • Deleted
  • Reason: reply to now deleted question

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,902
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Whoa - it was a good question!
What is it that you were thinking would be accomplished by using an ND filter? Perhaps you were looking to lessen the depth of field, or maybe you had something else in mind, or maybe there is something that you misunderstand. In any case, my reaction was: "I wonder why Chris thinks that might help?"
I would suggest more exposure, and a strong warming filter to help counteract the heavy cyan cast.
May we see a photo of the negatives themselves?
 
OP
OP
ChristopherCoy

ChristopherCoy

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 9, 2011
Messages
3,599
Location
On a boat.
Format
Multi Format
Whoa - it was a good question!
What is it that you were thinking would be accomplished by using an ND filter? Perhaps you were looking to lessen the depth of field, or maybe you had something else in mind, or maybe there is something that you misunderstand. In any case, my reaction was: "I wonder why Chris thinks that might help?"
I would suggest more exposure, and a strong warming filter to help counteract the heavy cyan cast.
May we see a photo of the negatives themselves?

You're entirely right Matt. Yesterday was a very bad day for me as evident by my now deleted backlash at @Donald Qualls for which I sincerely apologize.

What it essentially boils down to is that I posted a question before I fully realized the thought, and then became irritated when questioned.
 

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,293
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
You're entirely right Matt. Yesterday was a very bad day for me as evident by my now deleted backlash at @Donald Qualls for which I sincerely apologize.

What it essentially boils down to is that I posted a question before I fully realized the thought, and then became irritated when questioned.

Accepted. We've all had days like that.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom