Interpreting Densitometer Readings

Crazy Horse Memorial

H
Crazy Horse Memorial

  • 0
  • 0
  • 45
.

A
.

  • 3
  • 3
  • 65
Alhambra

A
Alhambra

  • 0
  • 0
  • 81
.

A
.

  • 7
  • 1
  • 140
Coney Island

A
Coney Island

  • 2
  • 0
  • 123

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
186,779
Messages
2,601,585
Members
96,624
Latest member
presch
Recent bookmarks
0

Silverpixels5

Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2003
Messages
594
Location
Houston, TX
Format
Multi Format
I did a speed test on APX 100 in Rodinal 1:50, then took the film to the local lab to get denisity readings for each shot. I was in a rush to get back here to work so I didn't have time to ask him about the numbers. The readings are whole numbers, and I would think I would just have to take the base 10 log of each, and subtract out the FB+fog, to get the density, but it seems like my numbers are a bit high. Here's the numbers I got from the lab:

Zone 1: 18
Zone 0.5: 14
Zone 1.5 : 22
Zone 2: 27
Zone 8: 99
Zone 7.5: 89
Zone 8.5 : 108
Zone 9: 130
Zone 0: 9

Any help in this would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
 

Thilo Schmid

Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2002
Messages
352
Location
France
Format
Multi Format
You must divide the numbers by 100 to get logD readings. The zone 0 reading states film base and fog density. If this reading is omitted, the FB+fog is usually already subtracted.
 
OP
OP
Silverpixels5

Silverpixels5

Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2003
Messages
594
Location
Houston, TX
Format
Multi Format
Thanks! Everything works out great now, plus I feel pretty stupid. I'll put this college degree to use one of these days...lol....
 
OP
OP
Silverpixels5

Silverpixels5

Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2003
Messages
594
Location
Houston, TX
Format
Multi Format
Ok if i'm interpreting this correctly then my film speed of 100 is about right with a Zone 1 density of 0.09, but my Zone VIII exposure is too low with a reading of 0.9. So this means I need to increase my development time in order to get my Zone VIII exposure to about a 1.3, correct?
 

Thilo Schmid

Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2002
Messages
352
Location
France
Format
Multi Format
Silverpixels5 said:
So this means I need to increase my development time in order to get my Zone VIII exposure to about a 1.3, correct?

That's correct. Whether 1.3logD is good for Zone VIII depends on your enlarger head. The densitometer readings are taken with a diffuse light source. If you use a condensor head, 1.1-1.2 logD would be more apropriate for a Zone VIII.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom