Most of the time I'd have to say no. It would be easyto compare a print from APX 25 to a print from Kodak's Recording Film, but to tell APX from Pan-X, oooh, not me.
There are so many variables: lenses, papers and developers. I might not be able to tell the difference between a Plus-X photo done in Rodinal and a Tri-X photo done in D-76 stock. I have an 11x14 from a Tech Pan neg and a friend was looking at it one day and said, "That's from 35 mm?"
Paper could make a huge difference too. A matte finish toned with sepia could easily diguise a type of film.
Maybe for Clark Kent...