Hexar vs. Fuji

IMG_7114w.jpg

D
IMG_7114w.jpg

  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Cycling with wife #1

D
Cycling with wife #1

  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Papilio glaucus

D
Papilio glaucus

  • 0
  • 0
  • 9
The Bee keeper

A
The Bee keeper

  • 1
  • 4
  • 139
120 Phoenix Red?

A
120 Phoenix Red?

  • 7
  • 3
  • 144

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,177
Messages
2,770,653
Members
99,574
Latest member
A nother Kodaker
Recent bookmarks
0

thebanana

Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2004
Messages
2,666
Location
Manitoba, Ca
Format
Medium Format
I appreciate the comments that members have made in my previous post regarding the Hexar AF. I'm looking for a relatively small AF camera to use primarily for street shooting and casual shots. The Hexar attracts me because of it's features and the f2 lens. I've also looked at a Fuji 645 Af, which attracts me because of the medium format, which is what I shoot primarily with my Mamiya 1000s. I would be able to stay with one format with the Fuji. I'm not sure how much of a drawback the f4 lens would be, and the Fuji has other features that I like, such as the ability to handle film speeds up to asa1600. The obvious solution would be to buy both of them, but then I'd have to factor in lawyers fees for the impending divorce that such a move would precipitate. If anyone has any comments on the pros and cons of either camera, I'd appreciate hearing them. Cheers,

John
 

Mongo

Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2004
Messages
960
Location
Pittsburgh,
Format
Multi Format
I have the Fuji. Great camera, as long as you don't mind using it mostly as a point-and-shoot. The "manual" features are available, but they feel like they were implemented as an afterthought. Focusing in particular is a major pain. Now, if you used the camera exclusively and practiced with it a lot, I'm sure you could get to the point that you could manipulate it easily. But as someone who only carries it occasionally, I find that I just let the autofocus do its thing (and it's never let me down), and I shoot in aperture priority mode only.

Upsides: Very good build, razor-sharp lens, small for a 6x4.5, easy to use, film loading's dead easy, can imprint exposure data outside of frame.

Downsides: f/4 lens if you're shooting indoors (although you can handhold this puppy to some pretty slow shutter speeds), not pocketable unless you are wearing an overcoat, goofy manual focus mode, depth of field is an intellectual exercise (as it always is with rangefinders), only 15 shots per roll.

Overall: They'll have to pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
 

jvarsoke

Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2005
Messages
117
Format
Holga
Most of the negatives are the same for the Hexar, with the exception of the lens speed and 15 shots per roll.

but, yeah, bring a crowbar if you want mine.
 
OP
OP
thebanana

thebanana

Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2004
Messages
2,666
Location
Manitoba, Ca
Format
Medium Format
Thanks. I've made my decision. Fuji it is! Now to list some of the gear I have laying around in order to mitigate the damage on the homefront!
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom