Here's some interesting shots of very early motion picture darkrooms

IMG_7114w.jpg

D
IMG_7114w.jpg

  • 1
  • 0
  • 33
Cycling with wife #1

D
Cycling with wife #1

  • 0
  • 0
  • 26
Papilio glaucus

D
Papilio glaucus

  • 1
  • 0
  • 20
The Bee keeper

A
The Bee keeper

  • 1
  • 4
  • 147
120 Phoenix Red?

A
120 Phoenix Red?

  • 7
  • 3
  • 149

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,178
Messages
2,770,698
Members
99,573
Latest member
A nother Kodaker
Recent bookmarks
0

Kino

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 20, 2006
Messages
7,688
Location
Orange, Virginia
Format
Multi Format
Hope this is not too off topic, but I find these very interesting and maybe you will too:
 

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
19,974
Location
Honolulu, HI
Format
Large Format
Neat stuff! It's giving me ideas. I'd like to try processing Super-8, but the Lomo spiral and G-3 rewind tanks seem hard to come by. A rack and tank system like the ones in the first picture might be just the thing.
 
OP
OP
Kino

Kino

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 20, 2006
Messages
7,688
Location
Orange, Virginia
Format
Multi Format
David and Tom,

Check this out: Dead Link Removed

See under "build your own".

Happy processing...
 
OP
OP
Kino

Kino

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 20, 2006
Messages
7,688
Location
Orange, Virginia
Format
Multi Format
David A. Goldfarb said:
Neat stuff! It's giving me ideas. I'd like to try processing Super-8, but the Lomo spiral and G-3 rewind tanks seem hard to come by. A rack and tank system like the ones in the first picture might be just the thing.

OH, I have a G3 and, let me tell you, you don't want to process in a G3 unless you have the optional motor kit! Its fine for anyone in a War Zone, processing 16mm gun camera footage to get "quick" (less than the period between ice ages) recon info on dogfight kills or troop movements, but it leaves a HUGE amount to be desired for producing a high quality image.

The Lomo is much quicker, easier to use (with a little practice and a dummy roll), you won't get such terrible directional effects as the G3 and it is much easier to chemcially re-expose the image than use the window and expose it to a light source.

You can also build a traditional reel rack (like in the plans on the website above), a miniature vertical rack (get your dimensions by winding a 50' load across two dowel pins) but the big problem with those are quantity of chemistry needed for each tank and the invariable directional effects that occur over the horizontal rack supports. The turbulation over the ends of the rack is much greater than the middle of the rack so, if you are not real careful, you get the tell-tale pulsing of density that typifies silent film to so many; Some think it is the uneven cranking of the camera but it is NOT 95% of the time.
 

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
19,974
Location
Honolulu, HI
Format
Large Format
Thanks for the links and suggestions. Upon further consideration, I'm thinking of something like the vertical racks but using them in 11x14" trays.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom