eumenius
Member
Hello friends,
with the aid of some good luck I've got a set of G-Claron 150/9 cells, very clean, but the front cell has some marks right on its center. I also have a Copal Press #0 to fit them in (the scales, alas, is another story - the irony is that I've got a factory set of them for Copal 0, not the Press variety). There are couple of very very minor tiny scratches in coating (filled them with black ink with permanent marker), and a smallish cloud of bad coating. Looks like the lens was put face down on something bad, or it was just improperly stored. The defective spot is visible in passing light - when I look on it on a black background of lens innards. Well, the question is simple: I know by heart that some small defects of front lens are OK while they are not dispersing too much stray light, because the front lens surface image doesn't show up focused anywhere in a final picture. Would this Claron be a fine performer, or I'm wrong? And while it's a copy lens, is its usage limited only to macro work?
The original lens that came in Claron-destined shutter was King CRT 75/3.5 lens, apparently a Tessar derivative. Is there a reason to try it as a close-up lens on 4*5? Anybody knows what was it for originally?
Cheers, and fine light - Zhenya
with the aid of some good luck I've got a set of G-Claron 150/9 cells, very clean, but the front cell has some marks right on its center. I also have a Copal Press #0 to fit them in (the scales, alas, is another story - the irony is that I've got a factory set of them for Copal 0, not the Press variety). There are couple of very very minor tiny scratches in coating (filled them with black ink with permanent marker), and a smallish cloud of bad coating. Looks like the lens was put face down on something bad, or it was just improperly stored. The defective spot is visible in passing light - when I look on it on a black background of lens innards. Well, the question is simple: I know by heart that some small defects of front lens are OK while they are not dispersing too much stray light, because the front lens surface image doesn't show up focused anywhere in a final picture. Would this Claron be a fine performer, or I'm wrong? And while it's a copy lens, is its usage limited only to macro work?
The original lens that came in Claron-destined shutter was King CRT 75/3.5 lens, apparently a Tessar derivative. Is there a reason to try it as a close-up lens on 4*5? Anybody knows what was it for originally?
Cheers, and fine light - Zhenya