Goerz Dagor 168mm f6.8 lens

Blackwater - Scotland

A
Blackwater - Scotland

  • 3
  • 1
  • 22
Petals

D
Petals

  • 2
  • 0
  • 45
The Portland

A
The Portland

  • 4
  • 0
  • 108
Achtertuin.jpg

A
Achtertuin.jpg

  • 4
  • 0
  • 104
Untitled-23ast.jpg

A
Untitled-23ast.jpg

  • 3
  • 1
  • 103

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,595
Messages
2,777,869
Members
99,654
Latest member
rwos
Recent bookmarks
0
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
383
Format
Analog
I just picked up a Dagor to use on my 9x12 camera and have read that it has a large coverage, even up to 8x10, stopped down. Is this correct? Also it doesn't have a series number, just Goerz, Berlin Anastigmat-Dagor. I think from the serial it is early 20's. So, this is a nice lens yes, as in famous Dagor? These 20's lenses are becoming my favourite, Tessar and Heliar also, wonderful.
 

bdial

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 2, 2005
Messages
7,462
Location
North East U.S.
Format
Multi Format
I have one of these, yes, it covers 8x10. It's the only Dagor I have used, and I haven't used it very much, so I can't say how it compares.
 

Ugo Dap

Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2007
Messages
12
Location
Belgrade, Se
Format
Multi Format
I have it too. Very nice lens for alt processes, I made cyanotype still life in my gallery with it. If wide open it has some sort of glow which might have influence on density (pardon my eng.).

Cheers,
Ugo.
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,261
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
A normal Dagor (Goerz AM Opt) 165mm will cover 7"x9" @ f45 and 5"x8" @ f16, the much later AM Opt 6½" WA Dagor only covers 10x8 @f45t, so I think your German 168mm will be quite similar to the US 165mm in it's coverage.

Ian
 

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
19,974
Location
Honolulu, HI
Format
Large Format
I have it as well, and it does cover 8x10". There could be some variation among these, since coverage can depend on the cell spacing in the shutter and the diameter of the shutter opening.
 

JPD

Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2007
Messages
2,154
Location
Sweden
Format
Medium Format
I have one also, but in an empty Compur. The cells have special threads, so it seems impossible to find another shutter for them. How good is the lens, really? Is it worth to have a "new" shutter machined to fit the cells?
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,261
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
My 12" Dagor (Goerz AM Opt) is wonderful, but how much I'd spend on re-shuttering another I'm not sure :smile:

I'd test it first using a Packard or Thornton Pickard shutter, but does yours have the aperture control still. You are caught by the lack of a standard in older Compurs.

Ian
 

JPD

Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2007
Messages
2,154
Location
Sweden
Format
Medium Format
My 12" Dagor (Goerz AM Opt) is wonderful, but how much I'd spend on re-shuttering another I'm not sure :smile:

I'd test it first using a Packard or Thornton Pickard shutter, but does yours have the aperture control still. You are caught by the lack of a standard in older Compurs.

Darn, I always forget that my father can make adapters for me if I can persuade him to visit his old workplace. I would get them free. :tongue:

Yes, the Compur still has the aperture mechanism, so maybe I should try it with slow film, as Anton suggests. I could use a loose fitting lens cap, remove it for exposure, and then cover the lens with my hand and slide the darkslide back.

I have two Dagors in working shutters, one 10 and one 13cm, plus a Steinheil Orthostigmat 13,5cm, Zeiss Doppel-Amatar 13,5cm and a RÜO Iricentor 18cm, so I'm in no hurry - but it doesn't feel good to have a lens I can't use.
 

JPD

Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2007
Messages
2,154
Location
Sweden
Format
Medium Format
Darn, I always forget that my father can make adapters for me if I can persuade him to visit his old workplace. I would get them free. :tongue:

I talked to him yesterday about it. He's very reluctant, but agreed to take a look at the lens cells and shutters. :cool:
 

illumiquest

Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2010
Messages
990
Location
Portland Ore
Format
Multi Format
Goerz 168mm Dagor Sample Images?

I just picked up one of these at a local antique shop and was wondering if anyone has any sample images? There's quite a bit of info on them including that they cover 8x10s, I'd like to see what they do before sticking film through a camera.
 

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
19,974
Location
Honolulu, HI
Format
Large Format
Comparison shots with 3 other lenses on 6x17cm (vignetting on the 168mm shot is due to the mechanical obstruction of the 6x17 extension back, not the coverage of the lens)--

(there was a url link here which no longer exists)

I've used it on 8x10", but I don't know if I have anything conveniently scanned at the moment.

Threads merged.
 

Dan Fromm

Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Messages
6,818
Format
Multi Format
illumiwhatsit, David, are you sure that a 168/6.8 Dagor will cover 8x10? Cover as in put good image in the corners, not cover as in put light in the corners.

I have two reasons for asking. The first is a long and hilarious thread on the LF forum -- here's the link http://www.largeformatphotography.info/forum/showthread.php?t=13109&highlight=lousy+dagor -- about whether a 7"/6.8 Dagor will cover 8x10. The second is calculations my friend Eric Beltrando, who's written a ray-tracing program and uses it to evaluate old lens designs, did on several generations of Boyer Beryl prescriptions. The Beryl is a Dagor clone, the Beryl prescription's in the parts of Boyer's archives that Eric has are uncannily close to prescriptions for Dagors in Goerz' patents. Eric has told me that Beryls are good for 70 degrees (not the 84 or so needed for a 168 to just cover 8x10) for non-critical work and for only 50 degrees for critical work.

Cheers,

Dan
 

illumiquest

Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2010
Messages
990
Location
Portland Ore
Format
Multi Format
@Dan Frommwhatsit - I don't really care whether it covers 8x10, primarily because I don't currently have an 8x10 to test it on. I was just wanting to know whether someone had digitized examples of what the lens looks like.

Ps. Sorry if my screen name confuses you.
 

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
19,974
Location
Honolulu, HI
Format
Large Format
illumiwhatsit, David, are you sure that a 168/6.8 Dagor will cover 8x10? Cover as in put good image in the corners, not cover as in put light in the corners.

For something critical, like a commercial architectural image that's going to be enlarged for a glossy poster, it might be marginal in the corners, and I don't see myself using an ancient uncoated lens for that anyway, but stopped down, the older 168/6.8 ser. iii, or at least the one that I have, is good enough with a few mm to spare for the 8x10's that I'm likely to make with it--namely landscapes and architecturals that I'm planning to contact print. Since it's such a compact lens, I also like it for 4x5" when I need lots of image circle.

According to Goerz's own catalogue, at f:32 a 6" Dagor should cover whole plate, and a 7" should cover 8x10", and 168mm would be somewhere in between.

Sometimes, all one needs is to put light in the corners, as long as there isn't any important detail there, and as long as the image isn't terribly distorted, like, say, at the edge of the image circle with an Angulon where the image quality drops off quite radically.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom