/ Register

Fuji's new GF670W Rangefinder: Priceless?

Discussion in 'Medium Format Cameras and Accessories' started by MarkG, Sep 14, 2010.

Thread Tools

Thread Tools

  1. Sep 14, 2010 #1
    MarkG

    MarkG Member

    Messages:
    33
    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2008
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Fuji announced their new GF670W at Photokina . . . and, no surprise, they did not announce its price. On my blog, I discuss the pricing history of the GF670 and speculate on the factors that may shape the as yet unannounced price of Fuji's new camera. You can read the post here: http://wp.me/ph0f6-3i

    Mark
     
  2. Sep 14, 2010 #2
    Ian Grant

    Ian Grant Subscriber

    Messages:
    19,249
    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2004
    Location:
    West Midland
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Now that's a camera I could lust after, I like a WA lens and could use that 55mm as standard.

    Ian
     
  3. Sep 14, 2010 #3
    OP
    OP
    MarkG

    MarkG Member

    Messages:
    33
    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2008
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Ian, and what would you be wiling to pay for the camera?
     
  4. Sep 14, 2010 #4
    Ian Grant

    Ian Grant Subscriber

    Messages:
    19,249
    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2004
    Location:
    West Midland
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    That's a $1000 question.

    In truth not an arm & leg. I can use my 617 camera at 6x12 if needs be with a 75mm lens which is at a very rough guess about the same horizontal angle of view.

    However the new Fuji would be far more practical as a single camera option, I often carry 6x6, 6x17 and 5x4 :D

    I'd have to see it might well be far cheaper to convert a Polaroid camera :smile: exchange rates and then regional pricing etc makes a HUGE difference.

    A 6x9 camera with a 65mm lens would be even better,

    Ian
     
  5. Sep 14, 2010 #5
    Chazzy

    Chazzy Member

    Messages:
    2,948
    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2004
    Location:
    South Bend,
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    It's a pity that it isn't a folder.
     
  6. Sep 14, 2010 #6
    OP
    OP
    MarkG

    MarkG Member

    Messages:
    33
    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2008
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Ian, your "$1,000" response conforms well with the data presented in the poll on the Rangefinderforum that I discuss in the post. At least one person commented on my blog post that he expected the price to be around $2,500 because of the sophistication of the lens design . . . perhaps, though Cosina is the presumed manufacturer of the camera and they manufacture complex lens designs far less expensively than others (that's code for "Leica").

    BTW, I noticed your location is Turkey, er West Midlands, UK. The UK subsidiary of Fuji has put up their own website for the GF670 and has promoted the camera heavily. Maybe they'll be able to argue for more competitive pricing with Japanese HQ :smile:
     
  7. Sep 14, 2010 #7
    OP
    OP
    MarkG

    MarkG Member

    Messages:
    33
    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2008
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    @ Chazzy -- I agree. I'll bet the manufacturing cost of the folder design proved too expensive.

    Mark
     
  8. Sep 14, 2010 #8
    RobertV

    RobertV Member

    Messages:
    917
    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2009
    Location:
    the Netherla
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    The folder mechanism will be not there so they save some money on it but the lens design is pretty complicated although C.V. can make less expensive W.A. lenses (looking at the U.W.H. and S.W.H. but in M-mount now not a real bargain anymore). I predicted the Bessa III 667 introduction around Eur. 2000 2 years ago and for this new W.A. camera version I think around Eur. 2200.

    But we will see in a few months what happens.
     
  9. Sep 14, 2010 #9
    munz6869

    munz6869 Subscriber

    Messages:
    1,228
    Joined:
    May 17, 2004
    Location:
    ɐıןɐɹʇsnɐ 'ɐıɹoʇɔıʌ
    Shooter:
    4x5 Format
    This is more like a w.a. version of my GW680III, which, after using the GF670/Bessa III for a fortnight, I actually prefer to use (rather than a folder) - so if it's released, in a moment of madness I could see myself buying it. I don't like the shutter mechanism on these (it's so quiet and touch-sensitive) though - I prefer a satisfying "clunk", or a quiet shutter with a bit of depth to it...

    In regards to price - I always think my LF kit was expensive, but both in comparison to some of the rapidly obsolescing DSLR's with a decent set of lenses, are actually quite reasonable, even at US$2500+, given the negative size and optical quality. We just need to set aside $20 a week for two years or so ;-)

    Marc!
     
  10. Sep 16, 2010 #10
    yurihuta

    yurihuta Member

    Messages:
    188
    Joined:
    May 18, 2006
    Location:
    Washington, DC
    Shooter:
    Medium Format
    Marc,
    There is a wide angle version of your GW690III - it is the GSW680III with a 65mm lens. I have seen it here and there for sale, but it seems to be quite rare judging by how little I see it compared to the GW680III.

    Regards, Yuri
     
  11. Sep 17, 2010 #11
    munz6869

    munz6869 Subscriber

    Messages:
    1,228
    Joined:
    May 17, 2004
    Location:
    ɐıןɐɹʇsnɐ 'ɐıɹoʇɔıʌ
    Shooter:
    4x5 Format
    Yuri! Now why did you have to tell me that? Now I'll most certainly waste years searching for one.... :smile:

    Marc!
     
  12. Sep 20, 2010 #12
    TareqPhoto

    TareqPhoto Member

    Messages:
    1,171
    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2009
    Location:
    Ajman - UAE
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    I have GSW690III with 65mm, it is really wide enough, not sure how wider than my Mamiya 7II + 65mm or GW670 with this new 55mm.
     
  13. Sep 20, 2010 #13
    2F/2F

    2F/2F Member

    Messages:
    8,079
    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2008
    Location:
    Los Angeles,
    Shooter:
    Multi Format
    Exactly!

    I like the camera, but I would opt for a used 6x9 with the 65mm; it would probably be the older model with interchangeable lenses. The frame size and vertical AOV would be far more to my liking, and it would be cheaper.

    If this new camera was a folder, I might feel differently.