Willie Jan
Member
Hi,
I made two 4x5" on fp4+.
Shot was taken at 125 asa.
What i wanted to see is that the microphen would better display shadow details because of the speed boost. Grain is no issue for me.
1rst was developed in Microphen 1+3 at 14 minutes. (ilford time)
agitation 4 turns of the tank each minute.
2nd was developed in Rodinal 1+50 at 15 minutes. (ilford time)
agitation 4 turns of the tank each minute.
I expected the microphen to be better detailed in the shadow regions because they say that microphen boosts the film speed.
But the two negs look almost the same with the eye when i inspect the shadow areas. I have to make some prints, but i expect no great difference in tone.
Is it because of the dilution of the microphen?
Or is there another thing i did not take into account.
I made two 4x5" on fp4+.
Shot was taken at 125 asa.
What i wanted to see is that the microphen would better display shadow details because of the speed boost. Grain is no issue for me.
1rst was developed in Microphen 1+3 at 14 minutes. (ilford time)
agitation 4 turns of the tank each minute.
2nd was developed in Rodinal 1+50 at 15 minutes. (ilford time)
agitation 4 turns of the tank each minute.
I expected the microphen to be better detailed in the shadow regions because they say that microphen boosts the film speed.
But the two negs look almost the same with the eye when i inspect the shadow areas. I have to make some prints, but i expect no great difference in tone.
Is it because of the dilution of the microphen?
Or is there another thing i did not take into account.