David Muench - B&W images

Moon at Willson Downfall

A
Moon at Willson Downfall

  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Work from home

Work from home

  • 4
  • 2
  • 192
^

A
^

  • 9
  • 3
  • 227
portrait

A
portrait

  • 2
  • 1
  • 269
Nature Photographers

D
Nature Photographers

  • 0
  • 1
  • 166

Forum statistics

Threads
178,546
Messages
2,455,778
Members
94,561
Latest member
Evergreen States
Recent bookmarks
0

photomc

Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2003
Messages
3,575
Location
Texas
Shooter
Multi Format
Has anyone else seen the B&W work by David Muench that is in the current issue of View Camera? Have admired his work for some time, but was unaware of any B&W work and must say, I would love to see some in person.

If you haven't seen the work, pick up a copy..it's is worth it - IMHO..
 

matt miller

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 11, 2004
Messages
825
Location
Iowa
Shooter
Multi Format
I agree. The opening shot with the low sun and large boulders is fantastic. Some of his photos appear to be too dark for my tastes though. I'm sure they're better in hand.

The current issue of VC is, IMO, one of the best to date. Maybe it's just because most of the content is of interest to me. Regardless, kudos to Simmons for this issue.
 

scootermm

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 10, 2004
Messages
1,864
Location
Austin, TX
Shooter
ULarge Format
matt miller said:
The current issue of VC is, IMO, one of the best to date. Maybe it's just because most of the content is of interest to me. Regardless, kudos to Simmons for this issue.

I have to fully agree with this.
truly is a great issue. I love the Ikebana article especially. Im not a still life photographer in the least bit but these images and the article are wonderful.
 

philldresser

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 4, 2003
Messages
1,413
Location
Norwich, UK
Shooter
Multi Format
I agree that this is one of the best from a portfolio perspective. The standard is excellent.

I would be interested to here Sand Kings response tothe Pyrocat-PMK comparison. Any comments Sandy?

Plus I would love a 5x4 version of the cooke triple lens

Phill
 

roteague

Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
6,644
Location
Kaneohe, Haw
Shooter
4x5 Format
photomc said:
Has anyone else seen the B&W work by David Muench that is in the current issue of View Camera? Have admired his work for some time, but was unaware of any B&W work and must say, I would love to see some in person.

If you haven't seen the work, pick up a copy..it's is worth it - IMHO..

Unfortunately, I am still waiting on it to hit the bookstores. Just checked Barnes and Nobles yesterday, they still have the last issue. But, I am excited with all I hear about it.
 

mobtown_4x5

Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2004
Messages
243
Location
Baltimore
Shooter
4x5 Format
philldresser said:
Plus I would love a 5x4 version of the cooke triple lens

Phill

YES YES YES YES YES YES YES

anyone want to start an e-mail/letter/petition campaign?

How about picketing, sit-ins...:wink:

Matt
 

Tom Duffy

Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Messages
969
Location
New Jersey
It's ironic. I've been trying to pare down the number of magazines I subscribe to. I decided that View Camera was one I could let go. Ex of the Color portfolios, everything seemed to be duplicated someplace else, or was survey info easily availble through google. Then this porfolio laden issue comes along and it was so good that i had to buy it.

I read Gordon Hutchings review of the Cooke convertable and I couldn't help thinking that it was a little too glowing. I find it hard to believe that a convertable lens, down to a single element can match the performance of a modern optic, yet that's what Gordon seems to be implying. A simple comparison under a 10x magnifier of a Cooke negative vs. the same pic taken with an apo-symmar doesn't seem that difficult to do.

The PMK vs. Pyrocat was actually good in that there was a detailed comparison, within the limits of published pictures. Again it misses mentioning that Pryocat works in a Jobo and PMK doesn't.
 

philldresser

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 4, 2003
Messages
1,413
Location
Norwich, UK
Shooter
Multi Format
Tom Duffy said:
The PMK vs. Pyrocat was actually good in that there was a detailed comparison, within the limits of published pictures. Again it misses mentioning that Pryocat works in a Jobo and PMK doesn't.

Personally I don't think this was a completely fair or detailed comparison. In fact I thought it was particulary biased to PMK. I also thought it strange that no mention was made of Pyrocat-HD's founder, Sandy King or that some fairly serious articles/studies have been published on this developer.

It seemed to me the that the exposure was determined for a polaroid 55 and then replicated at the known ISO for a PMK neg, expecting Pyrocat to have the same characteristics. Proof that it hasn't is that the shadow detail was reduced. So, give it more exposure i.e change the film speed. It is documented well that Pyrocat retains film speed. The results that Steve S got could be attributed to slight under exposure and therefore being represented further down the curve. I might be wrong of course but thats how I see it.

Please someone tell me if this is wrong

However, the rest of the mag was top dollar.

Phill
 

roy

Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
1,324
Location
West Sussex
Shooter
Medium Format
philldresser said:
Personally I don't think this was a detailed comparison

It was the sort of report that would reassure anyone thinking that they might give Pyrocat a trial, not to bother and stick with PMK.
 

David Vickery

Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
67
Location
Central Texa
Shooter
ULarge Format
"I read Gordon Hutchings review of the Cooke convertable and I couldn't help thinking that it was a little too glowing. I find it hard to believe that a convertable lens, down to a single element can match the performance of a modern optic, yet that's what Gordon seems to be implying. A simple comparison under a 10x magnifier of a Cooke negative vs. the same pic taken with an apo-symmar doesn't seem that difficult to do."

Hey Tom, It isn't really all that hard to believe that the lens can perform well with just one lens cell. The front and rear cells are each made up of four Elements separated by a very specific air space--so specific that you could almost consider it as a fifth element--sorta like in the movie! So each cell has as many elements as a tessar, which obviously perform quite well with only four elements.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab
Top Bottom