pentaxuser
Member
I received the above magazine today from Fuji as may other U.K. Apugers who wrote to Fuji and then subscribed to it as a result of Fuji's reply.
It features examples of Fuji professional film and those using it.
Congratulations to our own Baxter Bradford for his two shots of Newlyn Harbour in Fuji Velvia 50 and the new Fujichrome 64T in the magazine and the feature article on him.
There is also one shot in Fujicolor Pro 400H which is one of the best examples I have seen of what is a low contrast colour neg film. We recently had a thread on films in which the poster was looking for a low saturation film. The shot in the magazine is worth a 1000 words of explanation about low saturation. It also features commercial photogs who have made the decision to stick with film. FWIW it mentions that independent studies by the Wilhelm Research Institute has concluded that Fuji Crystal Archive beats Kodak on stability. Fuji was reported to be stable for 40 years while Kodak was stable for 19 years.
I only highlight this for those interested and not to start a war on Fuji v Kodak paper or film for that matter.
It's a free mag which I subscribed to as a result of the e-mail I got from Fuji when sending support for their commitment to film.
If others have received it I'd be interested in their impressions of it.
Pentaxuser
It features examples of Fuji professional film and those using it.
Congratulations to our own Baxter Bradford for his two shots of Newlyn Harbour in Fuji Velvia 50 and the new Fujichrome 64T in the magazine and the feature article on him.
There is also one shot in Fujicolor Pro 400H which is one of the best examples I have seen of what is a low contrast colour neg film. We recently had a thread on films in which the poster was looking for a low saturation film. The shot in the magazine is worth a 1000 words of explanation about low saturation. It also features commercial photogs who have made the decision to stick with film. FWIW it mentions that independent studies by the Wilhelm Research Institute has concluded that Fuji Crystal Archive beats Kodak on stability. Fuji was reported to be stable for 40 years while Kodak was stable for 19 years.
I only highlight this for those interested and not to start a war on Fuji v Kodak paper or film for that matter.
It's a free mag which I subscribed to as a result of the e-mail I got from Fuji when sending support for their commitment to film.
If others have received it I'd be interested in their impressions of it.
Pentaxuser