Canon portrait lens

Beach Barista

A
Beach Barista

  • 2
  • 2
  • 210
In the Old Town

A
In the Old Town

  • 3
  • 2
  • 227
The Longest Day

H
The Longest Day

  • 0
  • 0
  • 153
Bad Copy

H
Bad Copy

  • 0
  • 0
  • 169
Coffee!

A
Coffee!

  • 0
  • 2
  • 218

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
177,874
Messages
2,442,126
Members
94,337
Latest member
kurbaikmcha
Recent bookmarks
0

modafoto

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 17, 2003
Messages
2,101
Location
Århus, Denma
Shooter
Medium Format
Hi

I have been looking for a portrait lens for my Canon EOS camera for some time now. I have found three lenses what I would like your comments on.
they cost about the same. If you have recommendations on other lenses I am open to them, but I primarily want comments on the lenses I mention below.


I am very keen on the first two, but thinks number 3 is too slow for my use.

Morten
 

TPPhotog

Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
3,041
Shooter
Multi Format
Morten I'm not familiar with Canon gear but I'd look at the fist one. The F.8 will give you an amazing amount of room over the F2 and as you know the best portrait lenses aren't always the sharpest :smile:
 

Nicole

Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
2,562
Location
Perth, Western Australia
Shooter
Multi Format
Hi Morten, I use Nikon and I looooove my 85mm f/1.8.
Cheryl (Jacobs) uses Canon and has the 85mm 1.8. I think, she could possibly give you some helpful info...
 

g0tr00t

Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
54
Location
South Pasadena, Fl
Shooter
35mm
modafoto said:
Hi

I have been looking for a portrait lens for my Canon EOS camera for some time now. I have found three lenses what I would like your comments on.
they cost about the same. If you have recommendations on other lenses I am open to them, but I primarily want comments on the lenses I mention below.


I am very keen on the first two, but thinks number 3 is too slow for my use.

Morten

Hmmm, tough choice. I would immediately jump on the 85 1.8, but the 100 will give you more of a distance to your subject and put them more at ease...

MMmmmm....I say the 100 f2. Forget the 2.8 (I use one for portraits and would love the 2.0)

Actually, I use the 80-200 2.8 L for portraits....So the 100 would be great IMO.
 

Dave Parker

Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2004
Messages
4,031
Shooter
Multi Format
I have an 85mm f/1.4 that I just love for portraits, great focal Length and faster glass really helps with natural light.

Dave Parker
Ground Glass Specialties
 

unohuu

Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2004
Messages
480
Location
Minneapolis
Shooter
35mm
...and i don't shoot Canon, but use a Minolta 85mm f/1,7 that i think is awesome. it is nice that it is fast enough to use in low light situations. i also have a 100mm f/2.5 and a 135mm f/2.8.
 

Lee Shively

Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2004
Messages
1,324
Location
Louisiana, U
Shooter
Multi Format
I do shoot with Canons but I don't own any of the lenses you mention. I did own an 85/1.8 when I shot Nikons and it was a great focal length.

To really mix up the pot, have you considered the 135/2L? It's more expensive than the others but I've always wanted to try that lens.
 

bjorke

Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2003
Messages
2,046
Location
SF & Surroun
Shooter
Medium Format
I had the Canon 85/1.8 and the 135/2. Both are terrific. I am busy saving for a Contax 85/1.4 now that I've switched, and while it's rarely used I'm quite fond of my Zeiss 90mm for the G.

For my total use, I got more mileage out of the 85mm.

7.jpg
 

mikeb_z5

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2004
Messages
217
Shooter
4x5 Format
I recently tried out the 135 f2 and really liked it as well. If I were to buy one though I think it would be the 100mm. Just a little more versatile.

Mike
 

eagleowl

Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2004
Messages
127
Location
UK
Shooter
Multi Format
my main portrait lens...

...is the canon ef 50mm f1.8.
Sharp,short minimum focal distance,and cheap(when I bought it 18months ago it cost me £80)!
 

Tom Duffy

Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Messages
969
Location
New Jersey
When my Leicaflex SL gave up the ghost, I had to decide what would take the place of the 90 f2 and 180 f 2.8 I had been using since the dawn of time.

After trying out the Canon 85 f1.2 and 85 f 1.8, I settled on the Canon 135 f2 as a mid distance compromise between my old 90 and 180 focal lengths. In general, I'm very pleased by my choice, though I'm finding the 135 a bit long for strict portraiture.

The 135mm is very, very sharp, with excellent out of focus areas (and lots of them at f2!) and it has phenomally fast autofocus (unlike the 85mm f 1.2, which couldn't autofocus its way out of a wet paper bag. I'd agree though, for strict portraiture, I'd probably pick the 85 f1.8 instead, even though the build quality isn't up to the standards of the 135.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab
Top Bottom