The other problem that might occur with repeated redevelopment in staining developers is stressing of the emulsion and cracks that show in prints. It will probably take more than 2 treatments, though.Michael Mutmansky said:Mark,
It will work with a stained negative, but you need to be careful of the B+F stain getting out of hand. If the negative is for silver printing, you probably won't have any problem, but if the neg is for an alternative process, the increased B+F may make printing times verrrrrrrry looooooong.
---Michael
MurrayMinchin said:Hi Mark,
There was a really good description of this process on Barry Thornton's site - which is now expired. Was anybody out there smart enough to print it out? If you did, could you give us all a detailed descrition? It does sound like you can breath new life into thinnish negatives this way. Never tried it though.
Murray
Michael Mutmansky said:Mark,
It will work with a stained negative, but you need to be careful of the B+F stain getting out of hand. If the negative is for silver printing, you probably won't have any problem, but if the neg is for an alternative process, the increased B+F may make printing times verrrrrrrry looooooong.
---Michael
For redevelopment, you need a bleach like that used for sulfide sepia toning. Proportions are not critical. A spoonful of potassium bromide and a spoonful of Potassium ferricynide in a liter of water will do the trick. Some recipes add carbonate.mark said:What did you bleach with?
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |