Beseler 45 Mixing Chamber

IMG_2142.jpeg

A
IMG_2142.jpeg

  • sly
  • May 20, 2025
  • 7
  • 2
  • 53
On The Mound.

A
On The Mound.

  • 3
  • 1
  • 65
Val

A
Val

  • 5
  • 2
  • 116
Zion Cowboy

A
Zion Cowboy

  • 10
  • 5
  • 101
.

A
.

  • 2
  • 2
  • 136

Forum statistics

Threads
197,792
Messages
2,764,398
Members
99,474
Latest member
MattPuls
Recent bookmarks
0

Todd Barlow

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 9, 2004
Messages
495
Location
Ontario
Format
Multi Format
I have a 45MXII with a 4x5 mixing chamber. I shoot both 35mm and 6x6 at this point. In your experience:

Is there a significant reduction in exposure times for 35mm?
Is there a significant reduction in exposure times for 6x6?
Are there alignment issues (always requiring an adjustment)?
Any other comments?

Thanks

Todd
 

Nick Zentena

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2004
Messages
4,666
Location
Italia
Format
Multi Format
I have a colour head on my CB-7 with the 4x5 mixing chamber. I've not seen any long times with 6x4.5 negatives. I haven't used it for much 35mm since getting it but it seems faster then my Durst 4x5. The Durst while slower then the Beseler had no problems with reasonable times for 35mm.

BTW I'm not sure what you're asking. The 4x5 box will increase your times some what. If you're asking if you should spend the money on the smaller boxes my answer would be only if you're having problems with the current one.
 

ann

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 10, 2002
Messages
3,336
Format
35mm
we have found the exposures need to be increased.
How much is going to depend on other factors, magificant, density of negatives, etc.
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
With my Beseler 45s, I find about a 1 stop speed difference between mixing chambers. So that if I am enlarging a 35mm negative and use a 6x7 chamber, I open up one stop and if I use a 4x5 chamber I open up 2 stops. That depends as well on what Ann said above. It varies from 1/2 to 1 stop depending.

In all, the exposure times are so reasonable that I often leave in the 4x5 chamber for everything.

PE
 

jeroldharter

Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2005
Messages
1,955
Location
Wisconsin
Format
4x5 Format
I just use the 4x5 chamber for everything. The exposure times are increased for smaller film formats, especially for 35 mm but that is not a bad thing. It allows me to open up the lens a little for smaller film formats and use a more optimal aperture. If I make 8x10's from 4x5 negative, I have to stop the lens down to f22 to get a usable exposure time. The lamp is very bright. On the other hand, if you are making 20 x 24 Cibachrome prints from 35 mm negative, then the proper mixing chamber might be worth it.
 

Papa Tango

Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2005
Messages
632
Location
Corning, NY
Format
Hybrid
jeroldharter said:
I just use the 4x5 chamber for everything. The exposure times are increased for smaller film formats, especially for 35 mm but that is not a bad thing. It allows me to open up the lens a little for smaller film formats and use a more optimal aperture.

Jerold, mine does just the opposite. What head are you using?
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom